The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
If we now inquire what was the extent of the land thus strangely
divided which was generally owned in the seventh century by the
Anglo-Saxon ceorl, we shall find that the determining factor is his
ability to grapple with the necessary cultivation of the soil; or,
in other words, the size of his estate is expressed in terms of his
ploughing power. The normal English plough-team consisted of eight
oxen yoked two and two together; and the land which it was possible to
plough by such an ox-team was called in English a _hide_, in the Latin
of the later lawyers a _carucate_.[94] The extent of a hide was not
always precisely the same even in the earliest times,[95] and in later
times there are puzzling differences in its dimensions, but as a rule
it seems safe to estimate it at 120 acres.
If a husbandman had only two oxen (in which case he would generally
have to rely on co-operation with his neighbours to get his land
tilled) he could only hope to cultivate the fourth part of a hide. This
was called a _yard-land_ in Old English, or a _virgate_[96] in legal
Latin. An even smaller division was the _ox-gang_ or _bovate_ (the
eighth of a hide), which belonged to the husbandman who had but one ox
to contribute to the common ploughing.[97]
The question now arises, “What was the ordinary holding of the
Anglo-Saxon ceorl during the first ages after his settlement in the
land, and what was his social position?” The answer, of course, must
be mainly conjectural, but especially when we consider the language
of Bede, and his Anglo-Saxon translators, who use “family” as the
equivalent of “hide,” it seems probable that the hide, whatever its
dimensions may have been, was the normal holding of the ceorl in his
day, and all the indications derived from the history of the seventh
century seem to point to the conclusion that the ceorl was a free man,
proprietor of the land which he cultivated, liable to service in the
_fyrd_ or national army, and to certain ecclesiastical payments, but in
every other relation independent. Metaphors are dangerous things, but
we may probably with safety characterise the numerous and sturdy class
of ceorls as the backbone of the Anglo-Saxon community.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account