The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman ConquestHodgkin, Thomas
History
The history of England, from the earliest times to the Norman Conquest
Hodgkin, Thomas
Great Britain -- History -- To 1066
To understand properly the information about wergilds supplied to
us by the Anglo-Saxon laws, we must devote a little attention to
the Anglo-Saxon currency. Our ancestors a thousand years ago used
for the most part the same pecuniary language that we use to-day.
They generally spoke of pounds, shillings and pence; and the clerkly
ecclesiastics who had to translate these words into Latin employed the
_Libra_, _Solidus_ and _Denarius_, which have given us the well-known
symbols £ s. d. This translation, however, into the terms of Roman
currency has done nothing but confuse our own monetary history. _Libra_
as the translation of pound is unobjectionable, but _solidus_--the only
coin of that name that obtained wide currency, the _solidus aureus_ of
Constantinople--was a gold coin of which 72 went to the pound of gold,
and was in intrinsic value equal to about thirteen shillings of our
present money. No _scilling_ that any Anglo-Saxon legislator ever dealt
with had any such intrinsic value as this. Similarly the _denarius_,
the true denarius of the republic and of the early empire, was a silver
coin intrinsically worth about eightpence of our present currency. No
penny in any Anglo-Saxon coinage ever approached this value; and the
translation of denarius by penny has introduced confusion even into
some well-known passages of the English Bible. Let us, therefore,
for the sake of clearness, wholly disregard the pretended Roman
equivalents, and confine our attention to the true, long-enduring Saxon
denominations, the _pund_, the _scilling_ and the _penig_.
1. The _pund_ meant a pound’s weight of silver. It was purely a “money
of account,” as no coin representing this value was ever struck by any
Anglo-Saxon king. According to the present value of metals, it would be
worth intrinsically somewhat less than £2 sterling.
2. The _scilling_ was also only a money of account, represented by no
actual coin. Its derivation (from _scylan_, to divide) seems to point
to the fact that it was originally a portion of a silver ornament,
probably a torque or an armlet broken off and cast into the scale, for
payment by weight of the trader’s demand. Even so, as we may remember,
St. Oswald ordered his beautiful silver dish to be broken up and
distributed to the starving crowd, who would take these _scyllingas_
into the market and exchange them there for the needed food. At a later
time the _scilling_ acquired a definite value, which, however, varied
much in the different English kingdoms. The Kentish _scilling_ was
one-twelfth of a pound; the Wessex _scilling_, one-forty-eighth; and
the Mercian, one-sixtieth.
3. But however much the _scilling_ might vary, the penny (_pending_,
_pening_ or _penig_) seems in all the English kingdoms to have ever
borne the same proportion to the pound which it bears at present,
namely, as 1 to 240. This enables us to state the varying values of the
_scilling_ in the following manner:--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account