The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.Hume, David
PhilosophyPhilosophy
The History of England in Three Volumes, Vol. I., Part D.: From Elizabeth to James I.
Hume, David
Great Britain -- History -- Elizabeth, 1558-1603; Great Britain -- History -- James I, 1603-1625
The imperious conduct of Elizabeth appeared still more clearly in
another parliamentary transaction. The right of purveyance was an
ancient prerogative, by which the officers of the crown could at
pleasure take provisions for the household from all the neighboring
counties, and could make use of the carts and carriages of the farmers;
and the price of these commodities and services was fixed and stated.
The payment of the money was often distant and uncertain; and the rates,
being fixed before the discovery of the West Indies, were much inferior
to the present market price; so that purveyance, besides the slavery
of it, was always regarded as a great burden, and being arbitrary and
casual, was liable to great abuses. We may fairly presume, that the
hungry courtiers of Elizabeth, supported by her unlimited power, would
be sure to render this prerogative very oppressive to the people; and
the commons had, last session, found it necessary to pass a bill for
regulating these exactions: but the bill was lost in the house of
peers.[*] The continuance of the abuses begat a new attempt for redress;
and the same bill was now revived, and again sent up to the house of
peers, together with a bill for some new regulations in the court of
exchequer. Soon after, the commons received a message from the upper
house, desiring them to appoint a committee for a conference. At this
conference, the peers informed them, that the queen, by a message
delivered by Lord Burleigh, had expressed her displeasure that the
commons should presume to touch on her prerogative. If there were any
abuses, she said, either in imposing purveyance, or in the practice of
the court of exchequer, her majesty was both able and willing to provide
due reformation; but would not permit the parliament to intermeddle in
these matters.[**]
* D’Ewes, p. 434.
** D’Ewes, p. 440.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account