The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
History
The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
Great Britain. Army. Lumsden's Horse; South African War, 1899-1902 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
Late that evening I received orders to hold myself in readiness at
4.30 A.M. for Kranz Kraal, whither we marched in company with the 14th
Brigade, our object being to protect a bridge about eight miles
distant on the main road to Bloemfontein, which the Boers intended to
destroy. We were only just in time to prevent them carrying out their
object, by getting there before them, with only a couple of casualties
among the Australian contingent. We spent the night at the bridge,
returning the next day to Spytfontein. While at the latter place we
were fortunate in securing a few more Government remounts to replace
several unfit horses. I may mention that at Spytfontein we were in
easy sight of the Boer outposts, being only eight miles distant from
Brandfort. A long flat plain separated the Boer boundary from our own,
and their scouts were distinctly visible to us every morning. Nothing
eventful occurred during the next few days, but on the 30th we
received our baptism of fire as far as we are personally concerned.
[Illustration]
-----
Footnote 4:
The Suffolk Company M.I., numbering 120, joined later.—ED.
-----
CHAPTER VIII
_THE BAPTISM OF FIRE—LUMSDEN’S HORSE AT
OSPRUIT (HOUTNEK)_
How often ignorant critics have sneered at that phrase ‘the baptism of
fire,’ which expresses finely, with literary completeness and force, a
truth of which men who have never been in the front line of battle can
know nothing! However much the phrase may have been degraded by
melodramatic application, it is a gem in its clearness of thought and
perfection of finish. The soldier’s first fight is a plunge from which
he emerges a new being. Whether the change may be for better or worse
depends probably on temperament and previous associations. The fire of
battle does not purify a sinner or sear the soul of a saint, but neither
is quite the same after as he was before passing through it. He has seen
things which, in some subtle way, unfelt, perhaps, and certainly
unacknowledged, will influence the remaining years of his life. It is
not only because he has looked death in the face—that is a common enough
experience elsewhere and leaves no perceptible trace—but he has stood
where dear comrades fell beside him in the midst of scenes that at other
times would be heartrending, and, as if in a state of complete
detachment from himself, he has passed callous through it all. The
braver a man is, the more surely some consciousness of that strange
state clings to him. To call it selfish indifference or the numbness of
fear, as some insolent ignoramus might, would be to falsify the history
of war. Selfish men and cowards do not walk with eyes open into the very
jaws of death to help a wounded comrade, nor would dazed brains be
capable of the swift thought that characterises soldiers in the direst
danger. Yet men who at such times have done deeds worthy of the Cross
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account