The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
History
The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
Great Britain. Army. Lumsden's Horse; South African War, 1899-1902 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
General Ian Hamilton’s left flank was being seriously threatened along
the Brandfort ridges, and their action, which seemed to them indecisive,
had so far relieved the pressure that Sir Ian was able the next day to
deliver his attack on Houtnek and drive the Boers from it in some
confusion. The apparent failure of General Maxwell’s brigade to carry
out the mission assigned to it in the flanking movement mentioned by
Colonel Lumsden may be accounted for by the fact that some of the
Brandfort commandos, finding themselves in danger of being cut off, had
drawn back from the contemplated movement against Ian Hamilton and
thrown themselves into the fight that was then raging about the spurs
and kopjes of the range from which Ospruit springs. Thus they
outnumbered many times the mounted troops under Colonel Henry, who,
having achieved his object, wisely retired from the left, leaving the
Boers in occupation of the ground they had won, but leaving them also
held firmly in check there by Infantry brigades, whose presence
prevented any further demonstration from Brandfort against Ian
Hamilton’s left. When Lumsden’s Horse marched back to their camp that
night, therefore, they might have congratulated themselves—though they
didn’t—on having done remarkably good service by something more than a
reconnaissance in force. The immediate result may be summed up in a few
words. General Hamilton, reinforced by another Infantry brigade and by
General Broadwood’s Cavalry, who rejoined him from Thaba ’Nchu way
during the night, was enabled to advance early on May 1 and strike a
strong blow by which, as Lord Roberts said in his despatch, ‘the enemy
was signally defeated at Houtnek with comparatively small loss on our
side, thanks to the admirable dispositions made by Major-General Ian
Hamilton.’ To this comment Lord Roberts adds an expression of regret
that the troops employed at Dewetsdorp and Wepener had been unable to
cut off the enemy’s retreat and capture his guns; but during these
operations the Boers, being evidently prepared for retreat whenever
their safety might be threatened, moved with very little baggage, each
fighting man carrying his blankets and food on a led horse. It followed,
therefore, that they could escape without suffering any loss beyond that
inflicted by our troops in dislodging them from their positions. This
was practically the official explanation, to which one may add that
Cavalry alone could not follow up effectively the retreat of Mounted
Infantry every man of which knew the country and how to utilise its
peculiarities for checking pursuit. By his masterly stroke at Houtnek,
however, General Hamilton had achieved something more than the capture
of a Boer stronghold. At the end of that action his troops were astride
of the most formidable defensive position between Bloemfontein and Vaal
River, and an unopposed advance two days later to Isabellafontein not
only took the enemy’s entrenchments on that side of Brandfort completely
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account