The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
History
The History of Lumsden's Horse: A Complete Record of the Corps from Its Formation to Its Disbandment
Great Britain. Army. Lumsden's Horse; South African War, 1899-1902 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
To be carried off captive after the first hot skirmish into which one
has gone full of confidence and hope is a trying experience for any
soldier, and especially for those who are conscious of having done
manful deeds deserving a better fate. In these circumstances, however,
it implies no humiliation, but only a feeling of rebellious resentment
against the fortunes of war that have, at one fell stroke, swept away
all hopes of further distinction, dashed every ambitious plan, and
severed for a time at least all pleasant associations with comrades
whose friendship is never so truly appreciated under other conditions as
it is amid the rough campaigning experiences that try the temper and the
mettle of all men. The full sense of everything that has been lost comes
upon war-prisoners in the first hours of their captivity with the
crushing force of a hopeless defeat, so that they cannot even find it in
their hearts to be thankful for the lives that have been spared to them.
If this is so in the case of men to whom loss of liberty means no
reproach and who have the proud consciousness that they did not purchase
safety by unfaithfulness to their trust, how much sharper must the sting
be to those who by pusillanimous surrender have brought the dark shadow
of dishonour on themselves and stained the proud blazonry of regimental
distinctions! Happily, British soldiers have not often gone into
captivity with that stigma resting on them; and, though critics at home
were ungenerously prone to assume that the ‘flag of shame’ had been
hoisted too readily in some fights against the Boers, they would have
told a different story if it had been their lot to lie on the bare veldt
within rifle-range of hidden enemies under whose deadly fire it is even
more dangerous to go back than to go forward. The idea of wresting
victory by a rush or wriggling up to it through zone after zone of
hailing bullets across four or five hundred yards of open ground could
only have commended itself to tacticians comfortably ensconced in
arm-chairs far from the buzz and boom of war. Hemmed in by a girdle of
fire that cannot possibly be broken by a charge across such distances,
men must either lie down like sheep to be slaughtered, or walk to their
deaths with eyes open, making useless sacrifices, or surrender; and none
but a braggart who had never been under fire would dare to hurl the
poisoned arrows of reproach at brave men upon whom the last alternative
has been forced. Every soldier knows how unjust is that journalistic
phrase ‘an easy surrender.’ Nobody could have written it if he had
thought for a moment of the bitterness that is in the hearts of men who
have to yield under the white flag; yet it is not necessarily an emblem
of shame for all that. Lumsden’s Horse did not hoist it in their direst
extremity, but they would be the last to jeer at men who have passed
through such an ordeal. If ever captives had the right to hold up their
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account