The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
Their countrymen on the continent long retained the original character of
their nation. During many ages they continued preeminent for their
bloodthirsty disposition and savage manners. _Charlemagne_ subdued them,
after a thirty years war, and forced them to become converts to _his_
Christianity, and submit to baptism; but their ferocity he did not
subdue, nor had their conversion any effect towards humanizing them.
They were, however, _called Christians_: which was like calling evil,
good, or Satan, an angel of light. These Saxon Christians, in the
twelfth century, quarrelled with the _Venedi_, a neighbouring nation,
because they objected against embracing _their_ Christianity, and refused
to renounce their own paganism, which they seemed to prefer, for its
cheapness. The former they found to be an institution attended with an
expence which they could but ill support. Bishoprics were to be erected,
with large revenues, Monasteries to be endowed, and an annual tribute,
under the name of tithes, to be paid by the whole country. Against this
the Venedi remonstrated, to Bernard Duke of Saxony, the christian
champion. They protested that they were very poor, and unable to bear
any heavy burden, such as providing for the maintenance of priests, and
especially for the dignity and parade of mitred prelates; that they were
fully determined to suffer any extremity, even to abandon their country
and state, rather than submit to so tyrannical an oppression. This firm
opposition of theirs to the will of the christian potentate, or rather
the Saxon tyrant, involved them in a long and bloody war, the final issue
of which was, their utter extirpation, by Henry Duke of Saxony, surnamed
the Lion, the great champion of the church on that occasion. The cruelty
with which he disgraced his victory, was horrible. Few revolutions in
history were attended with such circumstances of barbarity, or proved so
destructive to the ancient inhabitants. {232} Even Charlemagne, after he
had subdued the Saxons, by a long and bloody war, did not attempt to
destroy their whole race, but only transplanted a part, and the remainder
he endeavoured to reconcile to his empire by the establishment of his
Christianity. But the Saxons, by far more cruel than the Francs, were of
all conquerors the most destructive, extending the utmost rigour of the
sword against those who dared to contend with them for liberty or empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account