The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
The enslaved part of the inhabitants, and which is said to have
constituted by far the most numerous class of the community, went, like
the privileged orders, by different names. Of them the chief and most
remarkably were the _Villani_ and the _Servi_. In regard to the former,
we are told that Villenage was of two kinds: 1st _Pure Villenage_, to
which some were subject from their birth, from whom uncertain and
indeterminate service was due to the lord. The successors of these are
our _copy-holders_; who, though time has dealt favourably with them in
other respects, still retain one mark of their original vassalage, or
servitude; for as of old the former were not reckoned as members of the
commonwealth, but merely as part and parcel of the owner’s substance, no
way entitled to the privileges of freemen, so do their successors still
continue without any right to vote at elections by virtue of their
copy-holds. 2nd _Villenage by Tenure_, which bound the tenant to perform
certain services agreed upon between him and his lord; such as ploughing
his ground, reaping his corn, &c.
The lowest, as well as most numerous class of slaves among the
Anglo-Saxons were the _Servi_, who, (as well as all the rest of the
unfreemen,) were probably the descendants of the aboriginal inhabitants,
who had escaped the general massacre, or whose lives had been spared at
the reduction and conquest of the country. These were protected by
neither law nor religion, for a very long period; and they consequently
suffered the most unfeeling and cruel treatment. Christianity is said to
have ameliorated their condition. It certainly ought to have done so;
but from such a christianity no material amelioration could well have
been expected. Even our own boasted protestantism, how feeble has
generally been its influence in such cases! The long and bloody contest
between the rival and barbarous houses of York and Lancaster did more, it
seems, for the relief and emancipation of those poor English slaves than
any thing else; for the contending parties, in order to recruit and
reinforce their armies, found it convenient and necessary to liberate
great numbers of them: at length they were all manumitted, and Britain
now contains no people of that description. It would be well if the same
could be said of every other, part of the British dominions. These Servi
are often mentioned by Bloomfield and Parkin, and appear to have been
very numerous in the parts about Lynn before the conquest, and even long
after that period.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account