The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
A formal deed, attesting the truth of this ridiculous story, was drawn up
and subscribed by bishop Peregrine, the successor of Hubert, A.D. 1013.
{283} William of Malmsbury also, the most sensible of our old
historians, appears to have given it full credit. In short, it seems
very certain that it was long, in common with abundance of other similar
tales, universally believed; which shews how well established the
authority of the priesthood, and the popular reverence for that order,
must then have been in this country, and here at Lynn, as well as in
other places.
Next to the priests and monks, the magicians and fortunetellers appear to
have then possessed the largest share of the public confidence and
veneration; and very probably with equal worthiness. Strange tales have
been related by historians of the ascendancy which these sorts of people
long had over the infatuated inhabitants, and even over those of the
highest orders among them. These things give but an unfavourable idea of
our national character in those times. It would but ill become us,
however, to think very contemptuously of those foibles in our poor
ancestors, while we ourselves with all our boasted advantages and wisdom,
have not yet entirely left off consulting fortunetellers and conjurers:
to say nothing of the multitude of other impostors, of different sorts,
that are daily countenanced and caressed among us.
SECTION VII.
_Of the Heptarchy and its history—remarks on Egbert_, _Alfred_, _and
their most renowned successors—character of Canute_, _and of Edward the
Confessor_: _the latter the first of our monarchs that touched for the
Evil—remarks on that circumstance_, _and on the prevalence of that
complaint in the parts about Lynn_.
During a good part of the period from the Saxon invasion to the conquest,
England was divided into seven petty states, or kingdoms, usually
denominated, the Heptarchy, {285} the history of which is exceedingly
uninteresting; being, as Granger observes, a series of violence, wars,
and massacres, among petty tyrants, most of whom were a disgrace to the
human species.—Under the famous Egbert those states were consolidated,
and formed into one kingdom, under the name of England, which it has
borne ever since. The kings who have ruled it, from Egbert to the Norman
conqueror, were, for the most part, like their predecessors in the days
of the Heptarchy, very disreputable and worthless characters. There were
however, some exceptions, among which Alfred was far the most
conspicuous, and outshone the rest, as the sun does all the other
luminaries.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account