The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
25. JOHN DE WAKERYNG, archdeacon of Canterbury, who was confirmed by the
_archbishop_; which unusual circumstance was owing to the ecclesiastical
anarchy still existing, occasioned by the continuance of the grand
schism, which was then at its height. During that period there always
were _two_ popes, but they were now _three_, and each prefering a legal
claim to the papal chair, as the lineal descendant of St Peter! Three
contemporary popes exhibited an unusual and queer spectacle, and would
naturally suggest the idea of three heads of the church: and a church, or
any thing else, with _three heads_ may pretty fairly be deemed a
_monster_. Even the protestant church of England, however, has had
before now _two_ heads; one in London, and the other at St. Germans;
which ought to deter its members from bearing too hard on the church of
Rome in the above case. Bishop Wakeryng is said to have made
considerable improvements in and about his cathedral; which seems to have
been among his most praiseworthy performances. It appears that he died
in 1425.
Here it may be proper to observe, that in this bishop’s time, and that of
some of his predecessors, as well as of his immediate successor, the
tranquillity of the town of Lynn appears to have been exceedingly
disturbed by the violence of two contending factions, which kept the town
in a continual state of discord and distraction, it seems, for the space
of about thirty years: as may be gathered from existing documents, or
copies of Letters, of that period, still preserved in a MS. History of
Lynn, in the possession of _Mr. Thomas King_ of this town. {363} From
which we discover that those two contending factions were headed by two
of the Aldermen of that time; one of whom was _Bartholomy Petipas_, who
was _twice_ mayor, and the other _John de Wentworth_, who served that
office _three times_. The cause and nature of the difference that arose
between these opposing parties is not easy to develop. That their
animosity was bitter and violent is but too obvious, but its source or
ground is involved in no small obscurity.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account