The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 1 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
This document makes it very clear, that our Trinity Gild had acquired
large possessions: nor is it to be concluded that the above items, or
specifications, constituted the whole of them; their mercantile property
and revenue, at least, are still to be added, which cannot be supposed
inconsiderable; and there might be lands and tenements beside, that
belonged to them, which the king might not choose to include in the above
grant. However that was, it may be reasonably and safely presumed that
the possessions of this fraternity were much larger than those of any of
the rest, and that its weight and influence in the town were also very
considerable, not only exceeding those of any of the others, but even,
perhaps, of the corporation itself.—Its 13 chaplains may be considered as
a proof of its great opulence, as well as of its assuming a very high
religious character, which was looked upon, it seems, in those times, as
essential to the reputation and prosperity of all social institutions,
those of a civil and commercial, as well as of an ecclesiastic nature.
The case is not exactly so in the present day. Between our present
protestant corporation, with _only two_ chaplains, and this same gild
with _thirteen_, one may presume there must be what may be called a
pretty strong and striking contrast. We would fain hope, however, that
the advantage to the community lies very materially on the protestant
side.—Be that as it may, very different from what it is at present must
have been the state of things at the period of which we are now treating,
when the members of a fraternity which comprehended the first families in
the town, were prohibited, as has been already remarked, to appear before
the alderman, or at the gild meetings, _barefooted_; which clearly
indicates that it was then customary, for even the principal families, to
go about, ordinarily, _without shoes and stockings_. It was the case, no
doubt, with those of both sexes—shoes and stockings constituting then
only a part of the Sunday and holyday dress, or the _full dress_, of even
the people of the first fashion in the place, such as the Bagges, the
Everards, and the Hoggs of those days: Nor are we warranted to conclude,
that they were, therefore, less respectable or less happy than their
successors of the present generation. It was the fashion in those times,
and it could affect neither their respectability nor their happiness.
SECTION VI.
_Account of the remaining Gilds_, _and particularly those of_ St. Francis
and St. William.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account