The History of Lynn, Vol. 2 [of 2]Richards, William
History
The History of Lynn, Vol. 2 [of 2]
Richards, William
Fens, The (England); King's Lynn (England)
“Forasmuch as the Earl of Manchester, in his articles of agreement
with the town of king’s Lynn, remitted the offence in reference to
himself and his array while they lay before the town; but touched
upon no private injuries done by the malignants to the well-affected:
it is this day ordered by the Lords and Commons that such persons as
did take any of the goods of the well-affected, by themselves or such
as they appointed, or did any damage to their houses or mills, or any
other ways, shall make restitution to all such well-affected persons
as have been damnified, according to the greatness of their losses.
And that _Col. Walton_, governor of King’s Lynn, _Mr. Percival_ and
_Mr. Toll_, members of the House of Commons, [for that town,] shall
examine what damage hath been done to the well-affected, and appoint
such as have done them injury to make them reparation accordingly:
and if any of them shall refuse to make such reparation, that the
said governor, Mr. Percival, and Mr. Toll, shall have power to
sequester so much of the estates of such malignants as will make the
reparation, and assign it to those that have been damnified.” {760a}
Hence it appears, that the town was then divided into two great political
parties, the most powerful of which approving, and even admiring the
corruptions and insanities of the Court: how far the case is similar or
dissimilar at present, we need not say.
Sometime after the above order was issued by the two Houses, a party of
royalists, at the head of which was young _L’Estrange_, afterwards the
noted Sir _Roger_, formed a plan for surprising the town and recovering
it for the king, who had granted him a commission, constituting him its
governor, in case of success. But the design was betrayed by two of his
confederates, though both bound by an oath of secrecy: which shews what
trusty and choice hands they were. L’Estrange was consequently seized,
tried by a court-martial, and condemned to die as a traitor. The
sentence however was not executed. He remained in prison from 1644 till
1648, when he luckily escaped, and sometime after got out of the kingdom,
where he remained, as was said before, {760b} till the autumn of 1653,
when he succeeded in making his peace with the Protector: after which he
lived in this country unmolested to the day of his death, when he was at
a very advanced age.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account