The history of magic : $b including a clear and precise exposition of its procedure, its rites and its mysteriesLévi, Éliphas
Religion
The history of magic : $b including a clear and precise exposition of its procedure, its rites and its mysteries
Lévi, Éliphas
Magic -- History
Blind and unfortunate indeed were those initiates of the Antique
Mysteries who ridiculed the ass of Bethlehem without perceiving the
infant God Who shone upon the peaceful animals in the stable—the Child
on whose forehead reposed the conciliating star of all the past and
future. Whilst philosophy, convicted of impotence, offered insult to
victorious Christianity, the fathers of the Church assumed all the
magnificence of Plato and created a new philosophy based upon the
living reality of the Divine Word, ever present in His Church, reborn
in each of its members and immortal in humanity. It would be a greater
dream of pride than that of Prometheus, were it not at the same time a
doctrine which is all abnegation and all devotion, human because it is
divine and divine because it is human.
CHAPTER VI
SOME KABALISTIC PAINTINGS AND SACRED EMBLEMS
In obedience to the Saviour’s formal precept, the primitive Church
did not expose its Most Holy Mysteries to the chance of profanation
by the crowd. Admission to Baptism and the Eucharist was in virtue
of progressive initiations; the sacred books were also held in
concealment, their free study and, above all, interpretation being
reserved to the priesthood. Moreover, images were fewer and less
explicit in character. The feeling of the time refrained from
reproducing the figure of Christ Himself, and the paintings on the
catacombs were, for the most part, Kabalistic emblems. There was the
Edenic Cross with the four rivers, where harts came to drink; the
mysterious fish of Jonah was replaced frequently by a two-headed
serpent; a man rising from a chest recalls pictures of Osiris.[139] All
these allegories at a later period fell under proscription, owing to
the Gnosticism which misapplied them, materialising and debasing the
holy traditions of the Kabalah.
The name of Gnostic was not always rejected by the Church. Those
fathers whose doctrine was allied to the traditions of St. John
frequently made use of this title to designate the perfect Christian.
Apart from the great Synesius, who was a finished Kabalist but of
questionable orthodoxy, St. Irenæus and St. Clement of Alexandria
applied it in this sense. The false Gnostics were all in revolt against
the hierarchic order, seeking to level the sacred science by its
general diffusion, to substitute visions for understanding, personal
fanaticism for hierarchic religion, and especially the mystical licence
of sensual passions for that wise Christian sobriety and obedience to
law which are the mother of chaste marriages and saving temperance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account