The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
The drafts above alluded to consisted of two letters, one addressed
to the Pope, the other to the Queen of Hungary. The contents were
practically a repetition of the declarations which Cromwell drew up
for Mary to transcribe six months before. The expressions used were of
course less abject than those which purported to be addressed by her to
her father, but the renunciation was the same. The conclusion of the
letter addressed to the Pope was to the effect that he should no longer
trouble himself with the affairs of England, since the King had really
and truly the right on his side, and reasons of his own to act as he
did. Of her own free consent, she had renounced the succession, and
begged that neither in the future Council nor out of it, the subject
might be mentioned, or anything done contrary to the wishes of the King
of England, or for the sake of the King of Portugal, because such was
her resolution, and she was much pleased with it.
Chapuys, we have seen, was quite convinced that nothing remained for
Mary but to sign the drafts. Her justification would, as before, be the
compulsion exercised, and her written protests would, he considered,
be sufficient proof that she had not been a free agent. Nevertheless,
he was anxious that the Pope should be told of the thraldom in which
she had signed, and should declare her guiltless of all participation
in the sin. His anxiety was probably the reflex of her own, and his
personal regard for her made him wish to soothe, as far as he was able,
her much-tried conscience. Since she had acted by his advice in the
tangled skein of diplomacy in which she was caught, his chivalry and
affection prompted him to obtain for her all the relief he could. He
wrote to the Emperor on the subject, and Charles referred the matter
to his ambassador in Rome. Cifuentes had no personal acquaintance
with Mary, and viewed the subject in the mere light of politics. He
told the Emperor in a ciphered despatch, that it would be useless,
and even dangerous to apply for a papal brief, absolving the Princess
from her oath, as, in his opinion, the imperial ambassador in England
had not shown sufficient cause why the publication of the Princess’s
justification to the world should be delayed; for should his Holiness
come to know what the Princess had done, the French would sooner or
later hear of it; and, if so, the King of England be immediately
informed of the fact, and therefore the danger to her life would be
increased twofold. The above were the reasons which he (Cifuentes) had
for not applying for a delay; but since Chapuys still insisted upon it,
after mature deliberation the following expedient had been thought of:
The Pope should be petitioned for a _vivæ voces oraculo in genere_,
tacitly including Mary, and empowering all confessors to absolve
those who might have fallen into these “new English errors”. “In that
class the Princess would necessarily be comprised, and therefore any
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account