The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Mary, knowing that when her father flattered, most mischief was like
to ensue, her coler going and coming, at last in a swoone fell down
amongst them. With that the King being greatly perplexed, what for the
fear of his daughter, and the frighting of his wife that was then great
with child, sought all meanes possible to recover her, and being come
to herself, bid her be a good comfort, for nothing should goe against
her, and after perfect recovery, took her by the hand, and walked up
and down with her. Then commandment was made that she should be called
Lady Princess, and the other Lady Elizabeth. Why, governor, quoth
the Lady Elizabeth, being but a child, how happs it yesterday, Lady
Princess and to-day but Lady Elizabeth? Here was a haughtie stomach
betimes.”[213]
The account is inaccurate in two points. Henry never gave in on the
question of Mary’s title. Princess in those days meant heiress to the
Crown, and he would have been less likely than ever to give it back
to his daughter, when the passionately longed-for son might shortly
be granted to him. Moreover, Elizabeth had been deprived of the title
by act of Parliament months before, and would not have remained in
ignorance of the fact till Mary’s return to court, as it had nothing
whatever to do with her sister, in the actual state of affairs, but
with the declared nullity of Anne Boleyn’s marriage.
On the 23rd May, arrived Hurtado de Mendoza, special envoy from
Charles V., to confer with Chapuys, and learn from him his latest
news of the King’s will, regarding the Portuguese match. He remained
in England for more than a year, and during that time, the wearisome
negotiations went on, with the utmost insistence as to detail, while
Henry was probably determined from the outset that they should come
to nothing. He declared bluntly his refusal to legitimatise Mary, but
held out hopes that she would be heiress to the throne, should he die
without legitimate issue. When the Emperor had first suggested the
marriage, the King of Portugal was disinclined to it, saying that no
confidence could be placed in Henry, but Charles had set his mind upon
it, and wrote to his ambassador in England, that if it appeared that
the Princess would be forced into some other union (he feared with
Cromwell) they were to see whether it would be possible to carry her
out of the country. Henry told Gardiner to answer any inquiries about
the Lady Mary’s marriage with Don Loys, that it was “neither agreed
upon nor in any towardness”. Further, in his instructions to Sir Thomas
Wyatt, whom he was sending as envoy to Charles, he told him that if
the Emperor marvelled, that there was no furtherance in the matter, he
should reply that Mendoza brought no commission for it, and came so
slenderly despatched that the default is not since supplied, and thinks
the matter scarcely in earnest.[214]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account