The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
It is to be regretted that Mary’s letter to her father on this occasion
has been lost, but to Cromwell she wrote as follows:—
“MY LORD,
“After my most hearty commendations, I do in semblable manner
thank you for your gentle and friendly letters. How I have
proceeded, touching the counsel of the same for the matter
declared by Mr. Wriothesley, because both by his relation and by
my letters, to the King’s Majesty you shall perceive, I shall not
trouble you with my vain words in writing: only this I will add,
that howsoever I am in this kind of thing affected, his Highness
in this, and all other things during my life shall find me his
most humble and obedient daughter, subject and servant; and so
I beseech you ever to say and answer for me. I shall not, God
willing, disapprove your saying in the same, while the breath
shall be in my body; as knows our Lord, who send you health.
“From Hertford Castle, the 17th of December, late at night. I
beseech your lordship to pardon me that I write not this letter of
mine own hand. I was something weary with the writing of the other
letter, and upon trust of your goodness, I caused one of my men in
this to supply the place of a secretary.
“Your assured loving friend during my life,
“MARYE.”[236]
Henry’s sole object in this negotiation appears to have been to
hoodwink the Emperor into a belief that he was again throwing himself
on the side of the German Princes, and to secure this, he allowed
matters to go further towards a conclusion than he had ever before
suffered them to go. With a great pretence of secrecy, he took care
that the French and Imperial ambassadors should know all about the
affair. Marillac wrote on the 27th December, to say that the news he
communicated to Montmorency on the 24th was confirmed “touching the
marriage of the lady Mary with the Duke of Bavaria, who three or four
days ago, _as secretly as he could_, went to visit her in a house of
the Abbot of Westminster, in the gardens of the Abbey, a mile from this
town, whither she had been brought. After having kissed her, which is
an argument either of marriage or of near relationship, seeing that
since the death of the late marquis, no lord of this kingdom has dared
to go so far, the said Duke had a long conversation with her, partly
in German, through an interpretator, and partly in Latin, of which she
is not ignorant. Finally, they mutually declared, the said lord his
resolution, taken with this King, to have her for wife, ‘_pourveu que
sa personne luy feust agréable_,’ and the said lady her willingness
to obey her father. He cannot say when the marriage will come off,
but some think in fifteen or twenty days; others that the weddings of
father and daughter will be on the same day, that is, as soon as the
lady, who is at Calais arrives. She is only detained by the wind, which
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account