The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
So far as Edward was allowed to entertain any warmth of affection, he
was, it may be said, sincerely attached to both his sisters, but he
was entirely a puppet in the hands of his uncles the Seymours. He was
nine years old at the time of his accession, and but for them might
have regarded Mary something in the light of a mother. She was in fact
his godmother, and had watched over him as well as circumstances would
allow, from his birth, but those who surrounded him were careful that
her interest in her young brother should not assume a more definite
shape than the bestowal of countless presents, and the constant
providing of juvenile amusements. One of his letters to her shortly
before his father’s death contains a pretty passage: “_Amo te, sicut
frater debet amare charissimam sororem, quæ habet omnia ornamenta
virtutis et honestatis in se_”.[252] In May 1546, he told her that
God had given her the wisdom of Esther, and that he looked up to her
virtues with admiration.[253] But scarcely was he on the throne, when
his uncles made him the mouthpiece of the narrow Puritan views to which
they were committed, and we find him writing to Katharine Parr, to
entreat her “to preserve his dear sister Mary from the enchantments of
the Evil One, by beseeching her to attend no longer to foreign dances
and merriments, which do not become a Christian princess”. When left to
himself, however, he showed her simple, child-like affection.[254] The
rapid decline of Henry’s health had been a signal to the Seymours to
seize what extra power they could. They even went so far as to amend
the King’s will, a few days before his death, conferring on themselves
more authority than had been already decreed. Henry had refused to
sign the amendment, but they, disguising the fact that it did not bear
the royal sign manual, carried matters with so high a hand that their
powers were taken for granted. The supreme authority had originally
been vested in sixteen executors, but the two Seymours claimed the
entire guardianship of the boy-king. Henry had had little regard for
his brothers-in-law. He knew them to be ambitious, and had been sparing
of his favours towards them. He suspected them moreover of a secret
fondness for the new doctrines, to which he was again strenuously
opposed, but as there was no kinsman of the blood royal to whom he
could confide his son, he was obliged to accept the inevitable.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account