The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Wotton’s account of his interview with Charles is extremely
interesting. The Emperor said: “Ought it not suffice you that ye spill
your own souls, but that ye have a mind to force others to lose theirs
too? My cousin, the Princess is evil-handled among you, her servants
plucked from her, and she, still cried upon to leave Mass, to forsake
her religion, in which her mother, her grandmother, and all our family
have lived and died.” Wotton told him that when he left England, she
was honourably entertained, in her own house, with such about her as
she best liked, and he thought she must be so still, since not hearing
to the contrary, he was driven to think there was no change. “Yes, by
St. Mary,” saith he, “of late they handle her evil, and therefore, say
you hardly to them, I will not suffer her to be evil-handled by them.
I will not suffer it. Is it not enough that mine aunt, her mother was
evil entreated by the King that dead is, but my cousin must be worse
ordered by councillors now? I had rather she died a thousand deaths,
than that she should forsake her faith and mine. The King’s Majesty
is too young to skill of such matters.” Hereupon, Wotton, professing
that it became him not to dispute with his Majesty, yet being forced
somewhat to answer him, said that he knew the King was young in years,
but yet “the Lord be praised for his gifts poured upon him, as able
to give an account of his faith as any prince in Christendom being of
thrice his years. And as for the Lady Mary, tho’ she had a king to her
father, hath a king to her brother and is akin to the Emperor, yet in
England there is but one king, and the king hath but one law to rule
all his subjects by. The Lady Mary being no king must content herself
to be a subject.”
“A gentle law I tell you,” said he, “that is made, the King’s majesty
being no ——” (illegible).
Wotton then asked, that Chamberlain, the English ambassador in
ordinary, might have the service of the Book of Common Prayer in his
house, without access of strangers. But the Emperor exclaimed, “English
service in Flanders! speak not of it. I will suffer none to use any
doctrine or service in Flanders that is not allowed of the Church.” If
his cousin the Lady Mary might not have her Masses, he would provide
for her a remedy, and in case his ambassador were restrained from
serving of God, he had already given him order that if the restraint
come to-day, that he should to-morrow depart.[274]
The Council replied to Wotton’s letter, that the Lady Mary might no
longer do as she had done, and that the laws would be henceforth
executed in her house. They concluded their ultimatum by saying that
“his Majesty also considers the Emperor’s demands for his ambassador
in England to use the Mass, and his denial to suffer his Majesty’s
ambassador within his dominions to use the Communion, too much unequal
and unreasonable, and therefore he doubts not the Emperor will
otherwise consider this matter”.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account