The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
The whole country welcomed her as one man, and it may be truly said
that it was the affection of Englishmen, no less than their loyalty
that had placed her on the throne. Nevertheless, she was beset with
difficulties. The art of reigning as she understood it was part and
parcel of the mediæval system, but it needed a spirit touched with the
inspiration of the new age, to direct the restless activities of a
nation already beginning to be permeated with the Renaissance. While
she looked back to the past, her people had emancipated themselves from
mediæval traditions.
Moulding her conduct on the ideals which she had venerated from her
youth upwards, she regarded the new needs and tendencies with suspicion
and dislike; and thus gradually a breach was formed between herself
and the nation. She had its interests as sincerely at heart as any
English monarch either before or after her, but those interests, as she
understood them, were hopelessly at variance with the seething crowd of
ideas that were transforming the life of the people.
With intense honesty of purpose, Mary stood at the parting of the
ways, between a mediævalism that seemed good in her eyes, and a
progress that all her experience had taught her to interpret as
revolution. It was partly her inability to distinguish between the
two, to seize the good element in the new modes of thought, that
brought about the catastrophe of her reign, and evolved anarchy out of
aspirations, which ably led and controlled, might have contributed to
the welfare of the realm. If it is unfortunate to be born in advance
of one’s age, it is doubly so to be behind it; but if conscientious
motives and earnest endeavour could have compensated for the mistake,
Mary would have won golden opinions instead of hatred and abuse. But
there were difficulties quite independent of her own limitations.
At the outset, the task of forming a government was a delicate one.
Nearly all the statesmen of the time had been members of Edward’s
Council and had proved themselves traitors. When she had restored the
Duke of Norfolk to the Council Board, had installed Sir John Gage
as Constable of the Tower, had made Sir Henry Jerningham a member
of her Privy Council, Vice-Chancellor and Captain of the Guard, had
knighted her faithful Rochester and set him over her household, had
promoted Waldegrave to the charge of the Grand Wardrobe, and had made
Sir Francis Englefield a Privy Councillor, the most important of the
public offices remained to be filled by those whom she could neither
afford to offend nor to dispense with, but who had all failed at the
critical moment. The Earl of Arundel became Lord Steward, the Marquis
of Winchester retained his office of High Treasurer, while many others
of doubtful loyalty, including Sir William Petre and Sir John Masone,
made her Privy Council a compact body of potential conspirators. Lord
Paget, the most dangerous of all, became Secretary of State and Privy
Seal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account