The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
In spite of the determination, boldness and assurance with which the
plot had been laid, the conspirators were mistaken in the measure
of the national discontent. Even the Devonshire men, supposed to be
staunch adherents of Courtenay’s house, were apathetic, and when it
became apparent that the young Earl would fail to come himself and lead
them, their last spark of enthusiasm died out. The Earl of Bedford, who
was sent against them, took a few of the leaders prisoners, Carew with
some of his companions escaping to France. Sir James Croft was closely
pursued, when he left London to spread revolt among his tenantry on the
banks of the Severn, and before one seditious word could be uttered,
his designs were nipped in the bud. He was arrested in his bed and
conveyed to the Tower.
The part taken by the Duke of Suffolk was particularly odious. If
he displayed a less craven spirit than Courtenay, his ingratitude
for past favours was far more glaring. The principal mover after
Northumberland, in the plot to deprive Mary of the Crown, he had been
freely and frankly forgiven, after only three days’ imprisonment,
being permitted to suffer for his treason neither in body nor estate.
So great moreover was the distinction accorded to his wife by Mary,
that the Queen sometimes gave her precedence over her own sister; and
if his daughter and her husband were still captives, it was owing to
the fact of the disturbed state of London, and its neighbourhood, the
direct result of his own and his friends’ treachery. There is little
doubt that there had been no further movement to raise the Lady Jane
to the throne, and had her father remained faithful, although sentence
of death had been passed on her, she would shortly with her husband
have regained complete liberty. None suspected Suffolk’s fidelity, for
with consummate deceit, the Duke feigned the deepest attachment to the
person of the Queen, giving repeated assurances of the same, and of his
approval of her marriage. So entirely was Mary deceived, that it was
thought she contemplated placing him at the head of her troops.[395]
The following account of his departure for the Midlands shows how
little she doubted him:—
“The 25th day of January, the Duke of Suffolk, the lord John Gray and
the Lord Leonard Gray fled (from his house at Sheen). It is said that
the same morning that he was going, there came a messenger to him from
the Queen, that he should come to the Court. ‘Marry,’ quoth he, ‘I was
coming to her Grace. Ye may see, I am booted and spurred, ready to
ride, and I will but break my fast and go.’ So he gave the messenger
a reward, and caused him to be made to drink, and so thence departed
himself, no man knoweth whither. Sir Thomas Palmer, servant to the Earl
of Arundel said on the morrow following, to a friend of his, that the
complot between the French king and the said Duke of Suffolk was now
come to light.”[396]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account