The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Brett, with twenty other prisoners, was taken into Kent to be
executed. On leaving the Tower, he expressed himself in these words: “I
am worthy of no less punishment than I do now go to suffer; for besides
mine offence, I refused life and grace three times when it was offered;
but I trust God did all for the best for me, that my soul might repent,
and thereby after this life attain to the more mercy and grace in his
sight”.[416]
When the extreme penalty of the law had been suffered by about sixty of
the most prominent rebels, a general pardon was extended to the mass
of the Kentish insurgents. Four hundred prisoners, with halters round
their necks, rode into the tilt yard at Whitehall, where the Queen,
from a balcony pardoned them, and ordered them to return home in peace.
Of those who still remained in the Tower, eight were pardoned by her
prerogative alone. Renard in his despatch of the 27th March says with
curious logic:—
“Sire, the Queen of England sent for me last Saturday, and told me
that persuaded by the Comptroller, Southwell, Petre, and those who
had examined the prisoners, she had pardoned eight of them, having
found no ground for suspecting or accusing them of treason in the late
rebellion. Among others were the Marquess of Northampton, affirming
that he had returned to the old religion, Cobham and his eldest son,
Davet (Daniel) and four others whom she did not name, and added that
from time immemorial, it had been the custom for the kings of England,
on Good Friday to pardon some prisoners. To this I answered that since
it had pleased her to dispense mercy, I could not and ought not to
make any objection, especially as she had done it by the advice of her
Councillors, but that she might have deferred the pardon till it had
been ascertained whether they were concerned in the plot or no; for
if they were, she had only thus increased the number of her enemies
by so many persons, setting them at liberty to strengthen Elizabeth’s
party.”[417]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account