The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
The preliminary formalities between the contracting parties,
interrupted by the rebellion, had been resumed. Count Egmont had
returned to England, bringing with him the ratification of the
marriage treaty, and a letter of instructions from Charles. He was to
represent to Mary, that as God had been pleased once more to give her
the victory over her enemies, and to deliver them into her hands, she
should, as they had before so largely abused the clemency with which
she had treated them, and in case they had not yet been brought to
execution, not delay to do so, but that their chastisement should be
prompt, and that she should rid herself of those whose will was so evil
towards her, that she might strike terror into the hearts of others.
Those who were to be pardoned should be pardoned also promptly, that
their fears being removed, they might the sooner lose the desire to
attempt anything further against her. Courtenay and Elizabeth should
be secured,[426] and the Queen should reflect that in the matter of
so manifest a conspiracy against her person, the smallest evidence of
guilt might be taken into account, and the persons suspected should be
put into a place where they would have no longer the opportunity of
doing harm. He added that if the Privy Council could not be induced to
proceed against Courtenay, he would be better out of the kingdom than
in it, for if the people no longer saw him they would soon forget him.
He ought to be either shut up in the Tower or got rid of.
With regard to the mischievous practices of the French ambassador,
Egmont was to represent to the Queen, that it would be well, either to
send him back to France at once, or to imprison him till he should be
recalled, to prevent his doing further harm, giving the French King
to understand in either case, what grave cause she had to proceed
severely, he having acted in such a manner as to lose altogether his
privileges as ambassador. Egmont was also to advise Mary to obtain the
recall of the Venetian ambassador, Sorranzo.[427]
With unparalleled effrontery, both the French and Venetian ambassadors
presented themselves at court, and congratulated Mary on her victory.
The Council thought it advisable that the Queen should conceal her
indignation for a time, and she, therefore, received them courteously.
De Noailles was, however, closely watched, a measure which he was not
slow to perceive, and complain of, whereupon Mary in an audience of the
1st March, reproached him vehemently with having stirred up the late
rebellion, and with continuing the same line of conduct with respect to
some of Wyatt’s accomplices who had fled into France, meaning probably
the Carews and their friends.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account