The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Sir Thomas Wyatt was brought to the scaffold on the 12th April,[442]
and so contradictory are the statements as to his conduct and words at
the moment of death, concerning the guilt of the accused pair, that
absolutely nothing can be deduced from them. According to the sheriffs
who were present at his last interview with Courtenay, Wyatt asked
his pardon for accusing him. According to Lord Chandos, who was also
present, he urged Courtenay to confess his crime. On the scaffold he is
said to have uttered these words: “Where it is noised abroad, that I
should accuse the Lady Elizabeth and the Lord Courtenay, it is not so,
good people; for I assure you, neither they nor any other now yonder in
hold, was privy of my rising before I began, as I have declared no less
to the Queen’s Council, and that is most true”. Upon this, however,
Weston said: “Mark this, my masters, that that which he hath shown
to the Council of them in writing is true,” and Wyatt by his silence
implied that he consented to what Weston had said.[443] But as no fresh
evidence was forthcoming, and as the case against Elizabeth had not
been formally proved, she was released from the Tower on the 18th May,
exactly two months after her committal. As she left, three volleys of
artillery were discharged from the Steelyard in sign of rejoicing and
congratulation.[3] A few days later Courtenay was also released, and
sent to Fotheringhay.
Sir Henry Bedingfeld had already for some time had the charge of the
Princess, and it was to his care, and that of the Lord Williams of
Thame, that she was confided, on her removal to Woodstock. Foxe’s
account of the supposed insults offered to her by Sir Henry Bedingfeld,
totally unsupported by any other evidence, falls into the region of
romance, the source of much that has been written about Elizabeth at
this period. When she came to the throne Bedingfeld frequently appeared
at court and was on the best terms with her, she playfully styling him
her jailer.
Nevertheless, Elizabeth was very closely kept and watched during the
months of her captivity at Woodstock, allowed to see none but those
appointed to be near her, and deprived of materials for writing, even
to Mary, unless with direct permission. It would, however, have been
very unlike what we know of her astuteness, if she had not contrived
means of communication with her friends. It was shortly before leaving
Woodstock, that she wrote with a diamond on a pane of glass, the famous
three lines, two of which sum up the whole case for and against her:—
Much suspected by me,
Nothing proved can be,
Quoth Elizabeth, prisoner.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account