The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
The first, but least formidable barrier to the reunion of the kingdom
with Rome, arose from the opposition of a small party unfavourable
to Papal jurisdiction. This party was confined almost exclusively
to London, and to parts of the southern and eastern counties, but
wherever isolated bodies of Puritans were to be found scattered up
and down the country, the same opposition naturally prevailed. The
great masses of country gentlefolk had become, in consequence of the
frequent changes of religion, indifferent to every form of faith;
they would have been ready, at the call of the Sovereign, to embrace
Judaism or Mohammedanism if their convenience or interest required it.
The yeomanry, farmers and peasantry were nearly everywhere intensely
Catholic, but especially in the north, where also a considerable
number of landed gentry were ready to suffer all things in defence of
the old religion. But another class had sprung up in the course of
twenty-five years, consisting of almost every second wealthy family in
the kingdom, enriched, in many cases entirely built up, from the spoils
of the churches and monasteries. And these would never consent to any
religious authority that might call their right to them in question.
Cardinal Pole was known to be opposed to any recognition of the title
of these lay proprietors; and without wasting efforts at this crisis,
in an attempt to induce Parliament to reverse Pole’s attainder, the
Chancellor appealed to the Pope for a bull, confirming them in their
possessions.
In reply to the before-mentioned letter, in which Pole spoke of his
having been kept knocking a whole year at the palace gates, Philip sent
Renard to Brussels to negotiate. Having graphically described the state
of the country, proving to the Legate that a general and immediate
restitution was out of the question, Renard persuaded him to leave the
matter for a time in abeyance. Meanwhile Julius III. signed a bull,
empowering the Legate to give, alienate and transfer to the actual
holders, all property which had been torn from the Church during the
reigns of Henry VIII. and Edward VI. The Pope had considered, after
consulting with canonists, that the continued alienation of Church
property was justifiable, if it proved the means of restoring the realm
to the faith.
This difficulty being settled, on Renard’s return to England, the
Lords Paget and Hastings were sent to bring the Legate home. Sir
William Cecil accompanied them, but in an unofficial capacity, probably
because, having become a Catholic, he would be a _persona grata_ to
Pole, and also to the Emperor on account of his moderate views.[481]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account