The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Giovanni Michiel also informed his Government that the execution of the
sentences “against the heretics, the late Bishop of London, Ridley,
and Latimer, Bishop of Worcester had been decided on, there being no
hope or visible sign of their choosing to recant”.[554] Gardiner had
nothing to do with the conviction of the two bishops, beyond the
fact that, as Chancellor, he was at the head of the civil power which
passed sentence upon them. He is known to have been personally averse
from the persecution, and, as we have already seen, he substantially
helped some of the suspects to leave the country before proceedings
could be taken against them. None the less, however, Foxe goes out
of his way to attribute to him the most horrible and inhuman desire
for, and satisfaction at, their death. The apparent object of the
martyrologist was to draw his favourite inference in regard to the
temporal judgment of God on miscreants. He says, admitting that he
obtained his information at _third_ hand: “The same day, when Bishop
Ridley and master Latimer suffered at Oxford (being about the 19th day
of October) there came into the house of Stephen Gardiner the old duke
of Norfolk, with the foresaid Master Munday his secretary above named
reporter hereof. The old aged duke, there waiting and tarrying for his
dinner, the bishop being not yet disposed to dine, deferred the time
to three or four o’clock at afternoon. At length, about four of the
clock cometh his servant, posting in all possible speed from Oxford,
bringing intelligence to the bishop, what he had heard and seen: of
whom the said bishop, diligently inquiring the truth of the matter, and
hearing by his man, that fire most certainly was set unto them, cometh
out rejoicing to the duke. ‘Now,’ saith he, ‘let us go to dinner’.
Whereupon they being set down, meat immediately was brought, and the
bishop began merrily to eat. But what followed? The bloody tyrant had
not eaten a few bits, but the sudden stroke of God’s terrible hand
fell upon him in such sort as immediately he was taken from the table,
and so brought to his bed, where he continued the space of fifteen
days in such intolerable anguish and torments ... whereby his body
being miserably inflamed within (who had inflamed so many good martyrs
before) was brought to a wretched end.”[555]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account