The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documentsStone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
History
The History of Mary I, Queen of England: as found in the public records, despatches of ambassadors, in original private letters, and other contemporary documents
Stone, J. M. (Jean Mary)
Great Britain -- History -- Tudors, 1485-1603; Mary I, Queen of England, 1516-1558
Anne had persisted to the last, in the declaration of her innocence;
but the often quoted letter, supposed to have been written by her to
Henry from the Tower, and which Burnet printed[167] as authentic,
because he had found it among Cromwell’s papers, must now be considered
spurious. That it should ever have been regarded as genuine, is among
the unaccountable beliefs that have obtained concerning this much
misrepresented woman. It proclaims itself a forgery by the style
of its composition and mode of expression, entirely unlike any of
Anne’s recognised and undisputed letters. The speeches also imputed
to her before her execution must be taken with extreme caution, the
opportunity being favourable to romance writers of every subsequent
period, to invent sentiments which neither would nor could have been
uttered or recorded, so great was the terror in which Henry was held by
ministers, judges, courtiers, and the people. On the other hand, doubt
has been thrown on the authenticity of words and actions which, viewed
with their context, are, to say the least, highly probable. Thus Mr.
Friedmann, the able biographer of Anne Boleyn, while he admits that the
one thing that preyed on her mind was her conduct towards the Princess,
discredits the story of her having thrown herself at the feet of Lady
Kingston, wife of the Lieutenant of the Tower, entreating her as a
favour in like manner to throw herself at the feet of the Lady Mary,
and in her name beseech her to forgive the many wrongs she had brought
upon her.[168] But there is evidence in a letter from Mary to Cromwell,
dated 26th May 1536, that Lady Kingston was then present with her,
and it is unlikely that she would have been sent to announce Anne’s
death, unless she had some special message to deliver. In this letter,
as if in response to Anne’s petition for pardon, Mary in mentioning
her fallen enemy adds, “whom I pray our Lord of His great mercy to
forgive”.[169] Moreover, Chapuys told Cardinal Granvelle, that on her
way to the scaffold, “the Concubine declared that she did not consider
herself condemned by divine judgment, except for being the cause of the
ill-treatment of the Princess, and for having conspired her death”.[170]
Although Henry took no pains to conceal the satisfaction he felt at his
deliverance from Anne, he chose to pretend that he was heart-broken
at her wickedness, and Cranmer, whose safety depended on a servile
acquiescence in his master’s every whim, begged him “somewhat to
suppress the deep sorrows of his Grace’s heart, and do violence to
himself, by accepting with patience and cheerfulness the decrees of
Providence”.[171]
In truth, not Henry alone, but the whole nation breathed more freely,
and the horror inspired by the injustice of Anne’s trial cannot be said
to have extended to any feeling of regret for her untimely end. On the
day of her execution, Chapuys, keenly observant of all that went on at
court, and of its effect upon the nation, wrote:—
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account