The History of Modern Painting, Volume 2 (of 4): Revised edition continued by the author to the end of the XIX centuryMuther, Richard
History
The History of Modern Painting, Volume 2 (of 4): Revised edition continued by the author to the end of the XIX century
Muther, Richard
Painting -- History
His biography explains a great deal in the character of the painter's
art. His works are unequal. In his picture "Last Tears," which appeared
in the World Exhibition of 1855, and which stands to his landscapes as a
huge block of copper to little ingots of gold, he entered upon a course
in which he wandered long without any particular artistic result. He
wanted to be a figure-painter, and with this object he concocted a style
of painting by a mixture of various traditions, seeking to unite
Prudhon, Correggio, and Leonardo. From the master of Cluny he borrowed
the feminine type with a snub nose and long almond-shaped eyes, treated
the hair like da Vinci, and placed over it the _sfumato_ of Allegri. His
drawing, usually so pictorial in its light sweep, became weak in his
effort to be correct, and his colouring grew dull and monotonous by its
imitation of the style of the Classicists. But during this period Diaz
made a great deal of money, sold his pictures without intermission, and
avenged himself, as he had determined to do, upon his former poverty.
He, who had begged upon the boulevards, was able to buy weapons and
costumes at the highest figure, and build himself a charming house in
the Place Pigalle. In all that concerns his artistic position these
works, which brought him an income of fifty thousand francs, and, for a
long time, the fame of a new Prudhon, are nevertheless without
importance. Faltering between the widely divergent influences of the old
masters, he did not get beyond a wavering eclecticism, and was too weak
in drawing to attain results worth mentioning. It is as a landscape
painter that he will be known to posterity. He is said to have been the
terror of all game as long as he was the house-mate of Rousseau and
Millet in Fontainebleau, and wandered through the woods there with a gun
on his arm to get a cheap supper. It is reported, too, that when his
pictures were rejected by the Salon in those days he laughingly made a
hole in the canvas with his wooden leg, saying: "What is the use of
being rich? I can't have a diamond set in my _pilon_!" It was however in
the years before 1855, when he had nothing to do with any
picture-dealer, that the immortal works of Diaz were executed.
[Illustration: _L'Art._ CONSTANT TROYON.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account