The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 1 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The _Lexington_ was captured on September 20, 1777. She had refitted at
Morlaix, whither she had gone when chased by the line-of-battle ship.
When ordered to sail she had not a full supply of powder on board, but
was, nevertheless, forced to go. She sailed on September 18th, and when
two days outside of the port she fell in with the man-of-war cutter
_Alert_, commanded by Lieutenant Bazely, and Bazely was one of the
fighters of whom British seamen have a right to be proud. His cutter
was smaller than the _Lexington_, and she had but ten cannon to the
_Lexington’s_ sixteen. The wind was strong and the sea was rough for
such light vessels, but Bazely forced a fight, and for two hours and
a half held his own. At the end of that time, however, his rigging
had been so badly hurt that he had to stop fighting and make repairs.
Seeing this, the _Lexington_, having expended all but a trifle of her
ammunition, made sail for home, and she would have got away had any
one but the plucky Bazely commanded the _Alert_. Bazely made repairs,
overhauled the _Lexington_, and again opened fire. The _Lexington_ held
on her course for an hour without being able to reply, and in the hope
that the wind would carry away some of the cutter’s sails. But the
cutter was well found, and the _Lexington_ was carried into Plymouth.
Lieutenant Bazely lived to become an admiral, and there is no doubt he
earned his promotion.
The fate of the _Lexington’s_ crew, because like that of every American
cruiser of those days, shall be told somewhat in detail. They were
thrown into jail without trial on a charge of high treason, and there
they were deliberately starved. On one occasion they were glad to
kill and eat a dog that strayed into their yard. The conduct of the
prison officials in their bearing toward the prisoners was insufferably
brutal.
Because the assertion that the prisoners were deliberately starved
may seem to some readers an exaggeration, the proof of the statement
shall be given from an English source. It may be found on page 152 of
the “Annual Register for the Year 1781,” published by G. Robinson,
Paternoster Row, London. In reporting the proceedings of Parliament for
June 20th of that year it says:
“A petition was presented to the house by Mr. Fox from the American
prisoners in Mill Prison, Plymouth, setting forth that they were
treated with less humanity than the French and Spaniards; that they had
not a sufficient allowance of bread, and were very scantily furnished
with clothing. A similar petition was presented to the house of peers
by the Duke of Richmond. It appeared upon inquiry that the American
prisoners were allowed half a pound of bread less per day than French
or Spanish prisoners. Several motions were grounded on these petitions,
but those proposed by the lords and gentlemen of the opposition were
determined in the negative, and others to exculpate the government in
this business were resolved in the affirmative.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account