The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 3 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
“It appeared that Governor Shortland with a regiment of armed soldiers
had stationed himself above the square, watching for a pretext to come
upon us. The bursting open of the folding gates, though unintentional,
seemed sufficient for his purpose; for he advanced with his soldiers
and ordered them to fire.
“His orders were promptly obeyed, the soldiers rushing in among the
fleeing prisoners, and firing among them in all directions. One poor
fellow fell wounded, and a number of soldiers surrounded him. He got on
his knees and begged them to spare his life, but their answer was:
“‘No mercy here.’
“They then discharged the contents of their muskets into him and left
him a mangled corpse. Others fleeing for the doors of their respective
prisons, that always before had been left open at turning-in time,
found them shut, and while endeavoring to gain the opposite door, found
themselves subject to the cross-fire of the soldiers. This was further
proof that this work was premeditated. After much inquiry we learned
that seven men were killed and sixty wounded.”
[Illustration: _From a copy of a daguerreotype at the Naval Academy,
Annapolis._]
As it happened, in the rush of prisoners to escape into their rooms, a
British soldier was wedged into the mass and carried inside. As soon
as he was discovered a Yankee boatswain piped for order. The doors had
now been locked and the prisoners had the soldier completely in their
power. With their wounded shipmates before their eyes--some of them
dying--a cry for vengeance arose.
“Hang him! hang him! hang him!” rang through the building. It was now
the soldier’s turn to beg for the mercy that had been refused to the
wounded one who had knelt and begged in the passageway. It is with the
heartiest satisfaction that Americans read in this day that when a
vote was taken among the prisoners as to what should be done with the
soldier, the result was “decidedly in favor of releasing him.” He had
merely obeyed the order of Captain Shortland.
There was an investigation, of course. Sixty-seven men, held prisoners
because they had refused to fight against their flag, had been shot
down in a prison where they were under the most rigorous rules,
although the ratified treaty of peace had been deposited in London
more than six weeks before. They had been shot down through the spleen
of a British post captain. Mr. Charles King represented the American
Government. “Mr. King had rather, at any time, smooth over a quarrel,
than increase the exasperation by dealing sternly with its causes,”
says an old-time apologist for his act. He conceived it to be his
duty to smooth over the wanton murder of which Captain Shortland was
guilty. When “the massacre at Dartmoor was _disavowed_ by the British
Government,” he was satisfied.
CHAPTER XIV
STORIES OF THE DUELLISTS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account