The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The stories of the _Monitor_ and the _Merrimac_ may soon be completed.
The _Merrimac_ was overhauled at Norfolk. Commodore Josiah Tattnall
relieved Admiral Buchanan in command. On the 11th of April he took the
_Virginia_ (_Merrimac_) down to Hampton Roads, expecting to have a
desperate encounter with the _Monitor_. “Greatly to our surprise, the
_Monitor_ refused to fight us. She closely hugged the shore under the
guns of the fort, with her steam up. Hoping to provoke her to come
out, the _Jamestown_ was sent in, and captured several prizes, but the
_Monitor_ would not budge.” That is from a Confederate account, and it
is truthful. The _Monitor_ was under strict orders from Washington not
to engage the _Merrimac_ unless forced to do so. A great fleet, that
included a number of vessels which were supposed to be able to sink
the _Merrimac_ by ramming, had gathered at Hampton Roads. Commodore
Goldsborough was in command of the fleet. The prizes mentioned, two
brigs and a schooner, were taken from Newport News and in plain sight
of the fleet. Professor Soley’s history says very truly that this
incident was “humiliating.” For about a month after that nothing was
done, but “on the 8th of May a squadron, including the _Monitor_,
bombarded our batteries at Sewell’s Point. We immediately left the
yard for the Roads. As we drew near, the _Monitor_ and her consorts
ceased bombarding, and retreated under the guns of the forts, keeping
beyond the range of our guns. Men-of-war from below the forts, and
vessels expressly fitted for running us down, joined the other vessels
between the forts. It looked as if the fleet was about to make a fierce
onslaught upon us. But we were again to be disappointed. The _Monitor_
and the other vessels did not venture to meet us, although we advanced
until projectiles from the Rip Raps fell more than half a mile beyond
us. Our object, however, was accomplished; we had put an end to the
bombardment, and we returned to our buoy.”
As the reader observes, this is also a Confederate account. Commodore
Goldsborough’s report says, on the contrary, that “the _Merrimac_
was more cautious than ever”; and that the “_Monitor_ was kept well
in advance so that the _Merrimac_ could have engaged her without
difficulty had she been so disposed.” But the unprejudiced reader will
say that a Farragut was needed at the head of the Union force.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account