The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
As the event showed, Eads was for the Mississippi what Ericsson was on
the coast. He was a man of original ideas. And yet, as Porter says, “it
is strange how slowly even the cleverest of men receive new ideas.” He
built ironclads, it is true, but with the smooth water in which he was
to send them afloat they might have carried a thickness of armor fit to
turn the heaviest shot instead of the boiler plate that was used. As
described by Eads himself, these boats “were to draw six feet of water,
carry thirteen heavy guns each, be plated with two-and-a-half-inch
iron, and have a speed of nine miles an hour. The _De Kalb_ (at first
called the _St. Louis_) was the type of the other six, named the
_Carondelet_, _Cincinnati_, _Louisville_, _Mound City_, _Cairo_, and
_Pittsburg_. They were 175 feet long, 51½ feet beam; the flat sides
sloped at an angle of about thirty-five degrees, and the front and rear
casemates corresponded with the sides, the stern-wheel being entirely
covered by the rear casemate. Each gun-boat was pierced for three
bow guns, eight broadside guns (four on a side), and two stern guns.
Before these seven gun-boats were completed, I engaged to convert the
snag-boat _Benton_ into an armored vessel of still larger dimensions.”
[Illustration: The _Pittsburg_.
_After a photograph._]
Each was propelled by a single paddle-wheel set into the stern, where
it was protected by the fork-shaped hull as well as a casemate. The
boats were expected to fight bow on, and the iron plate across the bow
was backed by two feet of oak. On the sides opposite the boilers the
iron armor was not backed save by a slender supporting frame, while the
stern had neither armor nor oak wall. The pilot-house was of good oak
covered with two and a half inches of iron in front and an inch less
in the rear. The crews had every incentive to keep the bow of the ship
toward the enemy.
“The armament was determined by the exigencies of the time. The army
supplied thirty-five old forty-two-pounders, which were rifled and so
threw a seventy-pound shell. These having lost the metal cut away for
grooves, and not being banded, were called upon to endure the increased
strain of firing rifled projectiles with actually less strength than
had been allowed for the discharge of a round ball of about half the
weight. Such makeshifts are characteristic of nations that do not
prepare for war, and _will doubtless occur again in the experience of
our navy_.” So says Mahan.
[Illustration: The Mississippi Fleet off Mound City, Illinois.
_From a photograph owned by Mr. C. B. Hall._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account