The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
In explanation of the refusal it should be said that when England
declared in favor of granting the South belligerent rights, orders
were issued that “required every ship-of-war or privateer of either
belligerent which should enter British waters to depart within
twenty-four hours afterwards, except in case of stress of weather, or
of her requiring provisions, or things necessary for the subsistence
of her crew, or repairs. In either of these cases she was to put to
sea as soon after the expiration of the twenty-four hours as possible,
taking in no supplies beyond what might be necessary for immediate use,
and no more coal than would carry her to the nearest port of her own
country, or some nearer destination. Nor, after coaling once in British
waters, was she to be suffered to coal again within three months unless
by special permission.” These orders were very annoying to the North,
because when made, the Confederates had not a single ship of any kind
afloat. It was simply excluding United States warships from what had
once been friendly ports. On the other hand, the determination that no
prizes should be sold in British ports was a hardship upon the South,
because it prevented the Southern cruisers, that were eventually sent
afloat, disposing of their prizes. Because of it the South did not
sell a single prize, for the other nations followed England’s lead in
this matter. But, on the whole, it must be said that while England’s
attitude toward the cruisers of the two belligerents was, by the letter
of the law, that of strict neutrality, the operation of this neutrality
was a much greater hardship to the North than to the South, considered
as national governments. The crews of the Confederate cruisers failed
to get any prize money, but they could “sink, burn, and destroy _ad
lib_.” They were about as great a menace to American commerce as if
they had been getting prize money. There is now no disputing the
oft-repeated assertion that England managed to maintain a neutrality
that should help the South and hurt the North as much as was possible
without causing open war with the United States.
Having failed to get his prizes sold in Cuba, because Spain had
followed England in refusing to allow such sales in her ports, Semmes
took another prize, the _Abby Bradford_, to Puerto Cabello, Venezuela,
hoping to find a market there. He says of this attempt:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account