The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
These forts were armed during the attack made upon them on April 7,
1863, with the following guns that could bear upon the ships: Ten
ten-inch smooth-bores, three nine-inch smooth-bores, two eight-inch
rifles, nineteen eight-inch smooth-bores, eight thirty-two-pounder
rifles, eighteen thirty-two-pounder smooth-bores, and ten ten-inch
mortars. No detailed account is given of the landward bearing guns of
these forts, but it may be said that the forts on Morris Island and
James Island were well fitted to repel troops, while the harbor forts
Moultrie and Sumter had nothing of account bearing toward the inner
part of the harbor.
[Illustration: In the Charleston Batteries: 300-pounder Parrott Rifle
after Bursting of Nozzle.
_From a photograph by Haas & Peale._]
In addition to the forts, there were a lot of torpedoes, beginning in
the channel off Fort Wagner and continuing around to a line of logs
and chains stretched from Fort Sumter across the channel to Sullivan’s
Island. It makes the gray-haired men of Charleston smile, in these
days, when these channel obstructions are mentioned; for, as Bishop
John Johnson--he who wrote “The Defence of Charleston Harbor,” a work
that is entirely fair and most interesting--said to the writer: “The
_moral_ effect of these obstructions was excellent--excellent.” And so
it was.
The first thing of importance done in Charleston harbor after
establishing the blockade was in the line of strengthening the
blockade, and not an attempt to reduce the city. This was the sinking
of the “Stone Fleet.” On December 20, 1861, twenty old hulks of ships,
well loaded with stone, were sunk in the channels. The importance of
this work is found only in the fact that it brought out conspicuously
the exact attitude of the British government toward that of the United
States.
Let the reader observe, first of all, that the hulks were “so disposed
as to obstruct navigation without impeding the flow of water.” They
were “intended to establish at Charleston a combination of artificial
interruptions resembling on a small scale those of Hell Gate or
Holmes Hole, and producing, like them, eddies, whirlpools and counter
currents, such as to render the navigation of an otherwise difficult
channel hazardous and uncertain.” The last quotation is from a letter
from Lord Lyons at Washington to the British Prime Minister.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account