The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
found in the fact that an eight-inch smooth-bore in the old days threw
a cast-iron projectile, weighing sixty-eight pounds, with a velocity
of 1,579 feet per second at the muzzle of the gun. The energy of the
projectile was estimated at 452 foot-tons. The modern eight-inch rifle
throws a steel bolt weighing 250 pounds, at a muzzle velocity of 2,500
feet per second, with a striking power of 10,830 foot-tons. The old
eight-inch iron shot could not penetrate four inches of iron plates,
while the modern steel bolt penetrates twenty-six inches of wrought
iron. The best thirteen-inch modern rifles have a striking power of
about 35,000 foot-tons and penetrate thirty-four inches of wrought iron.
After an apprenticeship of ten years, the gunmakers and shipbuilders of
the United States have done well enough to entirely satisfy the people
whom they have served. And yet the American navy, in the matter of
ships and guns, is at best the fifth in the world. It is not considered
necessary to the interest of this history to enter into any argument to
show that the American navy should have a higher standing in point of
numbers. But, if the story of the American navy has been written here
as the writer understood it, then it is apparent that the American’s
hope of peace has always rested on the efficiency of a modest number of
ships. We have had peace with the aggressive nations of the earth while
we have had an efficient force afloat, and we have suffered humiliation
when we have neglected our navy. To make the appeal that is likely
to be effective, history shows that it does not pay to try to get on
without a navy. It need not be either the first or even the third in
point of numbers, but it must be first in point of efficiency. To keep
our hands in practice and our tools from rusting and our inventors from
stagnation, we must lay down at least one new ship of the first class
every year. We must not forget that Europe has steadily built new ships
to improve on those with which we have led the way.
While building ships that in general construction were like those
of Europe, the United States has followed its ancient policy of
encouraging inventors by trying what the conservatives call “newfangled
notions.” The success that followed the adoption of “newfangled
notions” like steam power, the screw propeller, and the Ericsson
_Monitor_, has been fully appreciated by the world at large. The
“newfangled Yankee notions,” in fact, kept up the quality of the old
American navy. Since the navy began its rejuvenating career, ten years
ago, three “newfangled” ideas have been tried. One was a steam ram,
pure and simple. It was a ship designed to steam at seventeen knots
per hour, with a ram for its sole weapon of offence, and it was built
solely for harbor defence. Because, in its way, it is a revival of the
porcupine policy, nothing more need be said about it.
[Illustration: The _Vesuvius_.
_From a photograph by Rau._]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account