The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)Spears, John Randolph
History
The history of our Navy from its origin to the present day, 1775-1897, vol. 4 (of 4)
Spears, John Randolph
United States. Navy -- History; United States. Navy -- History -- Spanish-American War, 1898
The quotations above are from John Taylor Wood’s story of the action,
as printed in the _Century Magazine_, and Wood was a lieutenant on
the _Merrimac_. There is no dispute as to the facts which he there
relates. The points especially worth observing in this account are
these: The government batteries on shore continued their fire at the
Confederates after the _Congress_ showed the white flag, and this fire
killed friend and foe alike. The commanding officer of the _Congress_
“was _directed_ by Lieutenant Parker to return to his ship and have the
wounded transferred,” and the Confederate “gunboats were obliged to
haul off with only thirty prisoners, leaving Lieutenant Pendergrast” on
the _Congress_. Captain Buchanan’s report of the fight says that the
firing on the Confederate gunboats was “vile treachery”; and Scharf’s
history says that “very great indignation was felt and expressed by
the Confederates,” because the officers of the _Congress_ who had
surrendered did not hasten on board the last Confederate gunboat
leaving the side of the surrendered ship. It says their remaining on
the _Congress_ was “to the discredit of the honor of American sailors.”
Admiral Porter says, regarding Buchanan’s firing red-hot shot at the
_Congress_ when the white flag was flying and many wounded as well as
the unhurt were on board, “this was certainly most inhuman, since the
crew of the _Congress_ were not responsible for the act of the troops
on shore.”
It was a right fierce battle, and the things done were inevitable under
the circumstances--inevitable because of the passions excited by actual
conflict. If another battle of the kind be conceivable, then just such
doings must follow in its wake.
In after years Secretary of the Navy Welles wrote an account of the
effect this first raid of the _Merrimac_ had upon a Cabinet meeting
at Washington. Because it showed a lamentable ignorance of the real
power of the ship, and because the losses of the day were wholly due to
needless delays in preparing to meet the new style of warship, it is
worth while quoting one paragraph from his article:
“‘The _Merrimac_,’ said Stanton, ‘will change the whole character
of the war; she will destroy, _seriatim_, every naval vessel; she
will lay all the cities on the seaboard under contribution. I shall
immediately recall Burnside; Port Royal must be abandoned. I will
notify the governors and municipal authorities in the North to take
instant measures to protect their harbors.’ He had no doubt, he said,
that the monster was at this moment on her way to Washington; and,
looking out of the window, which commanded a view of the Potomac
for many miles, ‘Not unlikely, we shall have a shell or cannon-ball
from one of her guns in the White House before we leave this room.’
Mr. Seward, usually buoyant and self-reliant, overwhelmed with the
intelligence, listened in responsive sympathy to Stanton, and was
greatly depressed, as, indeed, were all the members.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account