The History of Philosophy in IslamBoer, T. J. de (Tjitze J.)
Islamic
The History of Philosophy in Islam
Boer, T. J. de (Tjitze J.)
Islamic philosophy -- History
7. On the whole, three great heresies set the system of Ibn Roshd in
opposition to the theology of the three world-religions of his time:
first, the eternity of the material world and of the Spirits that move
it; next, the necessary causal nexus in all that happens in the world,
so that no place is left for providence, miracle, and the like; and,
thirdly, the perishable nature of all that is individual, by which
theory individual immortality is also taken away.
Considered logically the assumption of a number of independent
Sphere-Spirits under God does not appear to have any sufficient basis.
But Ibn Roshd, like his predecessors, gets over this difficulty by
asserting that these Sphere-Spirits do not differ individually but only
in kind. Their sole purpose was to explain the different movements in
the system of the world, so long as its unity was still unknown. After
the Ptolemaic system of the world had been put aside, and these
intermediary Spirits had become superfluous, men identified the Active
Spirit with God, as, for the matter of that, they had even in earlier
times attempted to do, on speculative and religious grounds. It was
merely one step farther, to identify even the eternal Spirit of Man
with God. Ibn Roshd did neither of these things, at least according to
the strict letter of his writings; but his system, when consistently
carried out, made it possible to take these steps, and in this way to
arrive generally at a Pantheistic conception of the world. On the other
hand Materialism might easily find support in the system, however
decidedly our philosopher contended against such a view; for where the
eternity, form and efficacy of all that is material are so strongly
emphasized, as was done by him, Spirit may indeed still receive the
name of king, but seemingly by the favour merely of the material.
Ibn Roshd deserves at all events to be called a bold and consistent
thinker, although not an original one. Theoretical philosophy was
sufficient for him; but yet he owed it to his time and his position to
come to an understanding with religion and practice. We may devote a
few words to this point.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account