The History of Prostitution: Its Extent, Causes, and Effects throughout the WorldSanger, William W.
History
The History of Prostitution: Its Extent, Causes, and Effects throughout the World
Sanger, William W.
Prostitution
In 1811, M. Pasquier, Prefect of Police, drafted a bill for the regulation
of prostitutes, but it never went into effect, and the imperial ordinance
drawn by the prefect has been lost. Five years later, M. Anglis, Prefect
of Police under Louis XVIII., attempted the same thing with no better
success, the law officers of the crown seeming to have supposed that the
general provisions of the articles of the code on public decency and
"outrages upon public morality" covered the particular case of
prostitution. The last efforts that were made in France to obtain a law
for the regulation of prostitution were in 1819 and 1822, when the
ministry seriously thought of settling the whole matter by a royal
declaration. These endeavors had the same fate as the former ones,
leading to no result.
A general impression has prevailed of late years that the moral sense of
the public would be shocked by any legislative act licensing so great a
sin as prostitution; and as the government has assumed, without
constitutional warrant, the control and regulation of prostitutes, and has
exercised as full authority as it could have done had there been a law on
the subject, the deficiency has hardly been felt. A conscientious official
has occasionally experienced qualms of conscience at acting without legal
warrant; the government has sometimes been frightened by a menace of
resistance from some bold lawyer, but no trouble has ever actually arisen,
and custom now gives to the police regulations the force of law.
We shall review these regulations in another place; meanwhile a glance
must be cast upon the progress of morality in France during the
seventeenth, eighteenth, and nineteenth centuries.
The gallantry which distinguished the court of Henry IV. became more
refined, though not less criminal, under Louis XIII. Adultery and
seduction were every-day matters in the circles which educated Mary, Queen
of Scots, and developed the wit of the author of Grammont's Memoirs. Every
lady was presumed to have a lover; every man of fashion more than one
mistress. Richelieu boasted that no lady could reject him when he chose to
throw the handkerchief, and Mazarin was accused of intrigues with the
queen herself. Louis did not blush to visit his mistresses at the head of
his guards, and in all the pomp of royalty; and, as an instance of their
influence over him, it has been stated that it was at the request of
Mademoiselle de la Fayette that he consented to visit his wife nine months
before the birth of Louis XIV.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account