life, overwhelmed by the odium of the proceeding: different writers say
by different modes of death: I find in Fabius, far the most ancient
writer, that he lived even to old age; he states positively, that
advanced in years he made use of this phrase, "That exile bore much
heavier on the old man." The men of Rome were not remiss in awarding
their praises to the women, so truly did they live without detracting
from the merit of others; a temple was built also and dedicated to
female Fortune, to serve as a monument. The Volscians afterwards
returned in conjunction with the Æqui into the Roman territory: but the
Æqui would no longer have Attius Tullus as their leader; hence from
dispute, whether the Volscians or the Æqui should give a general to the
allied army, a sedition, and afterwards a furious battle arose. There
the good fortune of the Roman people destroyed the two armies of the
enemy, by a contest no less bloody than obstinate. T. Sicinius and C.
Aquillius were made consuls. The Volsci fell as a province to Sicinius;
the Hernici (for they too were in arms) to Aquillius. That year the
Hernici were defeated; they came off with respect to the Volscians on
equal terms.
41. Sp. Cassius and Proculus Virginius were next made consuls; a treaty
was struck with the Hernici; two-thirds of their land were taken from
them: of this the consul Cassius was about to distribute one half among
the Latins, the other half among the commons. To this donation he was
adding a considerable portion of land, which, though public property, he
alleged was possessed by private individuals. This proceeding alarmed
several of the senators, the actual possessors, at the danger of their
property; the senators felt, moreover, a solicitude on public grounds,
that the consul by his donation was establishing an influence dangerous
to liberty. Then, for the first time, the Agrarian law was proposed,
which even down to our own recollection was never agitated without the
greatest commotions in the state. The other consul resisted the
donation, the senators seconding him, nor were all the commons opposed
to him; they had at first begun to despise a gift which was extended
from citizens to allies: in the next place they frequently heard the
consul Virginius in the assemblies as it were prophesying--"that the
gift of his colleague was pestilential--that those lands were sure to
bring slavery to those who should receive them; that the way was paving
to a throne." For why was it that the allies were included, and the
Latin nation? What was the object of a third of the land that had been
taken being given back to the Hernici so lately our enemies, except that
instead of Coriolanus being their leader they may have Cassius? The
dissuader and opposer of the agrarian law now began to be popular. Both
consuls then vied with each other in humouring the commons. Virginius
said that he would suffer the lands to be assigned, provided they were
assigned to no one but to a Roman citizen.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account