The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.Gilroy, Clinton G.
History
The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.
Gilroy, Clinton G.
History, Ancient; Textile fabrics -- History
This is the definition of a learned and observant author, who lived
in Spain, and who must have been familiar with the facts. “_Frutex
virgosus sine foliis_” is a clear and striking description of the
Spanish Broom, the leaves of which are so small as easily to escape
observation[209]. The Stipa Tenacissima, on the other hand, is not a
shrub with twigs, but a grass, which grows in tufts, the long leaves
being as abundant and useful as the stems or straws. Clusius himself
(_l. c._) in laying down the distinction between the Spartum of the
Greeks, which he supposed to be the Spanish Broom, and the Spartum of
Pliny, which he supposed to be the Stipa Tenacissima, asserts that the
former is a shrub (_frutex_), the latter a herb with grassy leaves
(_herba graminacea folia proferens_). It is clear, therefore, that
the inhabitants of Spain in the time of Isidore still used the term
_Spartus_ in its original acceptation, viz. to denote the Spartium
Junceum of Linnæus.
[209] Dioscorides also describes the Spanish Broom to be “a shrub
bearing long twigs without leaves.” Isidore’s etymology, deducing
Spartus from Asper, is manifestly absurd.
When the Stipa Tenacissima was brought into use for making ropes and
for other purposes, for which the Spanish Broom was employed, the name
of the latter would naturally be extended to the former, and we may
thus account for the fact that the Stipa Tenacissima is now universally
known in Spain by the name _Esparto_. Indeed it is possible, that the
employment of the Stipa Tenacissima for these purposes may have been
as ancient as the time of Pliny; and his use of the word “_herba_” in
describing it, as well as the locality which he assigns to it, the
hilly country about Carthage, favors the common interpretation, and
perhaps even authorizes the conclusion, that his account is the result
of confounding the two plants together, so that he says of one supposed
plant things, which were partly true of both, and partly applicable
either to the Spanish Broom, or to the Stipa Tenacissima only. But,
even if this be admitted, it is still possible that the plant, from
whose fibres the “_pastorum vestis_” was manufactured, was not the
grassy Stipa, but the shrub, the Spanish Broom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account