The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.Gilroy, Clinton G.
History
The History of Silk, Cotton, Linen, Wool, and Other Fibrous Substances;: Including Observations on Spinning, Dyeing, and Weaving.
Gilroy, Clinton G.
History, Ancient; Textile fabrics -- History
We have no reason to assume, that man and the two lesser kinds of
horned cattle were originally independent of one another. So far as
geology supplies any evidence, it is in favor of the supposition,
that these quadrupeds and man belong to the same epoch. No properly
fossil bones either of the sheep or goat have yet been found, and we
have no reason to believe, that these animals were produced until
the creation of man. But, as we must suppose, that man was created
perfect and full-grown, and with those means of subsistence around him,
which his nature and constitution require, there is no reason why the
sheep and the goat may not have been created in such a state as to be
adapted immediately both for clothing and for food, or why it should be
considered more probable that they were at first entirely wild. They
may have been produced originally in the same abode, which was occupied
by that variety of the human race, to whose habits and mode of life
the use of them has always been so essential; and, if we assume, that
this abode was somewhere in the elevated land of central Asia, in the
region, for example, of Armenia, we adopt an hypothesis, which explains
in the most simple and satisfactory manner the apparent fact of the
propagation not only of men, but of these quadrupeds with them, from
that centre over immense regions of the globe.
With regard to historical evidence, it is certainly very defective.
No express testimony assures us of the facts included in the
above-named hypothesis. One thing, however, is certain, and it appears
very deserving of attention, viz. that the sheep and the goat have
_always_ been propagated together. We find great nations, which had
no acquaintance with either of these quadrupeds, but depended for
their subsistence upon either oxen or horses. We find others, on the
contrary, to whose mode of life the larger quadrupeds were of much less
importance than the smaller; but we find none, which were accustomed to
breed sheep without goats, or goats without sheep.
The reader will find numerous illustrations of this fact on reviewing
the evidence contained in the preceding chapters. General terms were
employed in the ancient world to include both sheep and goats[372].
Where more specific terms are used, we still find “rams and goats,”
“ewes and she-goats” mentioned together. Sheep and goats were offered
together in sacrifice, and the instances are too numerous to mention,
in which the same flock, or the wealth of a single individual, included
both these animals.
[372] It should be observed, that the Hebrew word translated _sheep_ in
Ex. ix. 3. included Goats.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account