Steam-navigation -- History; Steamboat lines -- History; Steamboats -- History
Two months later, the whole of the criminals concerned were in
custody, and charged with their offence at the Central Criminal
Court. Two of them, Moss and Solomons, turned Queen’s evidence. Lewin
Caspar (who had been for eighteen months in the service of the B.
and I. Co. as General Superintendent), was detained in custody until
sentence was pronounced, 3rd February, 1840, and was then acquitted,
owing to a flaw in the indictment. His father, Ellis Caspar, and
Emmanuel Moses, were each sentenced to be transported for 14 years,
and sailed for Sydney on the 20th October, 1840, on the convict
transport, LORD LYNEDOCH. Alice Abrahams (daughter of Emmanuel Moses)
was also convicted of being an accomplice, and was sentenced to
four months’ imprisonment. Mr. James Hartley (founder of the firm
of James Hartley & Co., London) rendered very valuable service to
the proprietors by his energy and skill in tracing and successfully
prosecuting the thieves. Mr. James Hartley was elected a Director in
1838, and for his services in connection with the prosecution of the
gold dust thieves, he was presented with a valuable piece of plate.
In 1842, the steamship DUKE OF CORNWALL was built, and added to the
fleet in order to meet the increased demands of the trade. Like her
sister ships, she was a wooden paddle steamer, and the last of this
type of craft employed in the service.
The British and Irish Steam Packet Co. were amongst the first
steamship owners to recognise the advantage (now universally
admitted) of the screw propeller over the paddle wheel as a means for
propelling steamships, and in 1845 they introduced into the London
and Dublin trade two schooner-rigged auxiliary screw steamers, one
of which was called the ROSE, and the other the SHAMROCK. Three
years later the B. and I. Co. had to encounter a fierce and powerful
opposition, engineered by the Messrs. Malcomson, of Waterford, but
which involved nearly all the leading Steamship Companies on the
East Coast of Ireland; the B. and I.; Belfast (Langtry’s); City of
Dublin; Cork; and Waterford Steamship Companies all taking part in
the contest. The Waterford Steamship Company placed steamers on the
London and Dublin station, and the Directors of the British and Irish
Steam Packet Company retaliated by placing steamers on the Waterford
and London, Waterford and Liverpool, and London and St. Petersburg
lines. The opposition lasted until April, 1851, when an arrangement
was come to, whereby the Dublin and London traffic was divided
between Messrs. Malcomson (Waterford Co.) and the B. and I., and at
the same time the City of Dublin Co. withdrew from their official
connection with the latter Company. In the meantime, several steamers
had been built of iron (notably the GREAT BRITAIN), and had proved by
the severest tests the great merits of that metal as a material for
shipbuilding. So convinced were the Directors of the B. and I. of the
advantages to be gained by the substitution of iron for wood, that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account