The History of Tammany Hall: Second EditionMyers, Gustavus
History
The History of Tammany Hall: Second Edition
Myers, Gustavus
New York (N.Y.) -- Politics and government; Tammany Hall (Political organization)
Of the thirteen Sachems, eleven were “Softshells”--a predominance due
to the activity of the “Barnburners.” The “Hardshells,” without doubt,
were in a majority in the Tammany Society and in Tammany Hall, but
they had taken no such pains as had their opponents to elect their
men. The Sachems’ meeting on January 20, professedly to decide the
merits of the contest, called for the ward representatives in turn. The
“Hardshells” refused to answer or to acknowledge the Sachems’ authority
to interfere with the primary elections of the people. The Sachems then
named by resolution the general committee they favored, thus deciding
in favor of the “Softshell” committee. There was no little suppressed
excitement, since the members of the Tammany Society, it was naïvely
told, though allowed to be present, were not allowed to speak.
Alderman Thomas J. Barr, a member of the Tammany Society and chairman
of the “Hardshell” committee, handed to the Sachems, on behalf of his
associates, an energetic protest. Summarized, it read as follows:
“Tammany Society is a private association, incorporated
for charitable purposes. There is nothing in its charter,
constitution or by-laws making it a political organization in
any sense of the term. The Democrats of New York City have
never, in any manner or by any act, vested in the society the
right to prescribe the rules for their government in matters of
political organization.
“The society comprises among its members men belonging to all
the different political parties of the day. The only political
test of admission to membership is to be ‘a Republican in favor
of the Constitution of the United States.’ It is, besides, a
secret society, whose transactions are known only to its own
officers and members, except so far as might be the pleasure
of the Council to make the proceedings public. It can never be
tolerated that a body which, in the language of its charter,
was created ‘to carry into effect the benevolent purpose of
affording relief to the indigent and distressed,’ and which is
wholly independent of the great body of the Democracy shall be
permitted to sit in judgment upon the primary organization of
the Democratic-Republican party of the city of New York; and
such a state of things, if its absurdity be not too great for
serious consideration, would amount to a despotism of the most
repugnant character and render the Democratic party of the city
an object of contempt and ridicule everywhere.… Tammany Society
owns a portion of the premises known as Tammany Hall, which is
let to Mr. Howard and forms the plant of his hotel. This fact
is all that gives to the Tammany Society any, even the least
political significance.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account