The History of the 2/6th (Rifle) Battalion, "the King's" (Liverpool Regiment) 1914-1919Wurtzburg, C. E. (Charles Edward)
History
The History of the 2/6th (Rifle) Battalion, "the King's" (Liverpool Regiment) 1914-1919
Wurtzburg, C. E. (Charles Edward)
Great Britain. Army. King's Liverpool Regiment; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
On September 5th, to the great delight of the overworked remnant
of officers, a draft of thirteen fresh ones arrived--Carr, Eupen,
Harper, T. W. Jones, Lever, Novelle, Profit, Broad, Roberts, Robinson,
Rycroft, Upward, and T. L. Williams. This was a great accession of
power, as in the matter of men the battalion was already up to a good
fighting strength. But there was still much to be done. Specialists
had to be trained, N.C.Os. to be selected, and the general process
of amalgamating and consolidating the new material so recently come
together to be perfected. A new Quartermaster, Lieutenant Jackson, also
reported for duty at this time.
The tour in the line ended on September 10th, when the 2/7th K.L.R.
once more took over from us, and one platoon per company took charge of
the four strong points in the subsidiary line. The only incident in the
latter part of the tour was the attempt of a strong patrol of the enemy
to round up a patrol of four men from our battalion. The effort was
made with determination, and eventually our patrol had to scatter. All
reached our line safely, but three of them were wounded in the fight.
On September 11th Colonel Fletcher returned from hospital, and the work
of organizing and training the battalion was renewed with the greatest
energy. Specialist classes both for officers and N.C.Os. were soon
hard at work; while for the companies, now so very much changed in
their personnel, general training, inspections, close order drill, and
all other approved methods for increasing knowledge and morale were in
full swing.
Meanwhile rumours of a move to a rest area had long been rife. The
Division had now been doing trench duty continuously for seven months,
and it was quite time that it was taken away for a general overhaul.
During all those months we had been kept more or less continuously in
the trenches, with no opportunity to improve on the lessons learnt,
and nothing to inspire our men to increase their efficiency, beyond
the regular round of eight days in reserve and eight days in the line.
Already the ordinary wastage of trench warfare, not to mention the
disaster of Armentières, had deprived us of many of our best N.C.Os.
and men. We had, in fact, lost as many men as if we had been in a
battle, but there was not that feeling of satisfaction, such as results
from a successful push, to animate the remainder. However that may be,
the theory that we were going out to rest grew steadily, and for once
proved correct. The idea of a "rest" was not in itself particularly
attractive, except that it meant freedom from shell fire, permission
to give up wearing the box-respirator, and other little relaxations of
that description. As a "rest" in the ordinarily accepted sense of the
word, it had long since been discovered to be a fraud, being, in fact,
a period of intense activity. Still, it was a change, and possibly
meant that the Division would thereafter be required for work a little
more stimulating than trench warfare.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account