The History of the 2/6th (Rifle) Battalion, "the King's" (Liverpool Regiment) 1914-1919Wurtzburg, C. E. (Charles Edward)
History
The History of the 2/6th (Rifle) Battalion, "the King's" (Liverpool Regiment) 1914-1919
Wurtzburg, C. E. (Charles Edward)
Great Britain. Army. King's Liverpool Regiment; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
At 6 p.m. the 2/5th King's Own Royal Lancaster Regiment relieved us,
and the battalion withdrew to bivouac in an open field just west of
Fontaine and on the south side of the Cambrai--Bapaume road. This
completed an awkward period of desultory but difficult fighting.
We took twenty-one prisoners, with one machine gun and one trench
mortar, but had two officers killed and two wounded, while among
the men there were fifty-nine casualties. The officers killed were
2nd-Lieutenant Purdie, a most popular and gallant Scotsman who had
been with us for a long while, and had seen active service during the
greater part of the war; and 2nd-Lieutenant Alty, D.C.M., who had only
joined us at Barly, but whose worth we knew, as he won his D.C.M. when
serving at Houplines in the ranks of the 2/7th K.L.R. Of the officers
wounded, Lieutenant James has been already mentioned; the other was
2nd-Lieutenant Shirt, who, like Alty, had joined us at Barly, and we
regretted his swift departure to "Blighty." Among the men the loss of
Company Sergeant-Major Woodward, of "C" Company, who was wounded during
the concentration in front of the Canal du Nord, was the most serious.
He was one of the very old members of the battalion who had risen
steadily to warrant rank. He was badly wounded and his subsequent death
in hospital was universally deplored. Company Quartermaster-Sergeant G.
Lane was promoted to fill the vacancy that had occurred.
[Illustration: Official Photograph by permission of The Imperial War
Museum.]
For the whole of September, during a good part of which the battalion
had been engaged in active operations, our casualties had totalled
as follows:--Four officers killed and 10 wounded; 47 men killed and
188 wounded; 13 men missing. Our "effective strength" was 34 officers
and 708 men, as against 42 officers and 919 men on September 1st.
Our "trench strength" was, as always, considerably lower than our
"effective strength," as the latter included everyone detached, whether
on duty or leave, who was not counted in the war establishment of
another unit. Moreover, the Transport, rear headquarters, and the 33⅓
per cent. forming the "nucleus party" have to be further deducted to
show the number of "rifles" available for fighting purposes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account