The History of the Assassins, Derived from Oriental SourcesHammer-Purgstall, Joseph, Freiherr von
History
The History of the Assassins, Derived from Oriental Sources
Hammer-Purgstall, Joseph, Freiherr von
Assassins (Ismailites)
After the fall of Alamut, and the other fortresses of the Assassins,
except that of Kirdkuh, Hulaku vacated the territory of Kaswin, and
marched to Hamadan, whither his general, Tanju Nowian, hastened from
Aserbijan, to lay an account of his victories at the foot of the
throne. Hulaku dismissed him, with instructions to advance to Rum and
Syria, and to subject the whole of Asia and Africa, to the extreme
western boundary, to his dominion. In the month of Rebi-ul-ewel, in the
555th year of the Hegira, he commenced his march against Bagdad, and
proceeded as far as Tebris, whence he sent an ambassador to the khalif,
Mostassem, with the message: “When we went out against Rudbar, we sent
ambassadors to thee, desiring aid; thou promisedst them, but sentest
not a man. Now, we request that thou wouldst change thy conduct, and
refrain from thy contumacy, which will only bring about the loss of thy
empire and thy treasures.”
The ambassadors having despatched their mission to Mostassem, the
latter sent the learned Sherefeddin Ibn Jusi, the most famous orator
of his time, and Bedreddin Mohammed, of Nahjiwan, to Hulaku, with a
haughty message. The khan, irritated at this, gave more easy audience
to the counsels of Nassireddin, who continually urged him to march
against Bagdad, and to the treacherous invitation of Ibn Alkami, the
khalif’s vizier. Moyededdin Mohammed Ben Mohammed Ben Abdolmelek
Alkami, who, as vizier, administered the affairs of the khalifat with
unlimited power, and, by the blackest treachery, caused its fall, is
stigmatized ignominiously, as traitor, throughout the whole east; and
the name of Alkami is not less abhorred, in their history, than is that
of Antalcides, in that of the Greeks: as eloquent, and versed in poetry
and the polite literature of the Arabs, as Nassireddin was in the
mathematical sciences, he was no less faithless to his lord. Both poet
and mathematician were traitors.[264]
Nassireddin had personal cause of complaint against Alkami, who, by
his censure, had occasioned the khalif’s throwing into the Tigris the
poem dedicated to him by the former; adding, that it was, in every
respect, badly written. It is probable, that Nassireddin was a better
astronomer than poet; but it is still more probable, that Alkami was
jealous of the credit which he might gain with the khalif. The vizier
would not have deemed it necessary to warn the viceroy of Khorassan,
Nassireddin Mohteshem, with whom the astronomer was, against a mediocre
or bad _Kasside_, who was a juggler, and wished to insinuate himself
into the favour of the khalif. Out of respect for Alkami, the viceroy,
on this warning, threw the astronomer into prison, notwithstanding
he had dedicated his great work, Akhlaki Nassiri, to him. He escaped
to Alamut, where, as vizier of the last grand-master, he, meditating
revenge against Alkami and the Khalif Mostassem, laid the foundation of
it in the ruin of the Assassins.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account