The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
From Fontainebleau the prisoners were conveyed by water to the Bastile.
During the passage, Biron was lost in gloomy reverie, and when he
entered within the walls of the prison his mind was racked with the
worst forebodings. Nor were the circumstances attendant on his abode
in the Bastile at all of a nature to raise his spirits. Placed in
the chamber whence the constable St. Pol had passed to the scaffold,
watched with lynx-eyed vigilance, and so carefully kept from weapons
that he was allowed only a blunted knife at his meals, he could not
help exclaiming, “This is the road to the Grêve.” While he was in this
disturbed state, superstitious weakness is said to have lent its aid to
complete his distraction. He was told that the Parisian executioner was
a native of Burgundy; and it instantly flashed into his recollection,
that having shown to la Brosse, an astrologer, his own horoscope under
another person’s name, the wizard predicted the beheading of the person;
and that Cesar, a pretended magician, of whom more will be seen in the
next chapter, had said, that “a single blow given behind by a Burgundian
would prevent him from attaining royalty.” The shock seems for the moment
to have utterly deprived him of his senses. Refusing to eat, or drink,
or sleep, he incessantly raved, threatened, and blasphemed. A visit
from the archbishop of Bourges, who came to offer the consolations of
religion, and who gave him some hopes of mercy on earth, rendered Biron
less violent. At the prisoner’s request, Villeroi and Silleri, two of the
king’s ministers, also visited him; and, either that his brain was still
wandering, or that he thought to establish a claim to pardon by appearing
to make important discoveries, or that he was prompted by a malignant
wish to involve in his own ruin those whom he hated, he is said to have
charged, and in the strongest terms, a number of innocent persons with
being engaged in treasonable practices. Whatever was his motive, his
purpose was frustrated; Henry did not thirst for blood; and it has been
remarked, that the documents which, on the trial, were brought forward
against the culprit, were not those that most forcibly criminated him,
but those which criminated him alone.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account