The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Nearly at the same time that de Jars was set free, the gates of the
Bastile were opened to admit three citizens of Paris, who had been guilty
of a crime which could not be overlooked; they had dared to remonstrate,
perhaps somewhat too roughly, against being robbed of the means of
subsistence. “They went,” says Guy Patin, “to M. Cornuel, and in some
degree threatened him, on a report being spread, that the payment of
the annuities receivable at the Town Hall was about to be suspended, and
the money to be applied _in usus bellicos_. The names of these three
annuitants are Bourges, Chenu, and Celoron, and they are all three _boni
viri optimeque mihi noti_. God grant, I pray, that no misfortune may
happen to them.” Whether the kind prayer of Patin was heard, we are not
told.
That such things should occur in a country governed as France was, is
quite natural. Richelieu brooked not even the shadow of opposition; and,
Louis, submissive slave though he was to an imperious minister, had all
the brutal pride of an Oriental despot. In two instances (out of many
which might be quoted), the one not long before, and the other shortly
after, this period, the monarch, to whom parasites prostituted the title
of “the just,” did not scruple to treat with contumelious insolence the
parliament of Paris, a body of magistrates, eminent for their learning
and other qualities. On the first occasion, having taken offence at a
request which they made, he told them that, “in future, whenever he came
to them, he should expect to be received outside the door of their hall,
by four presidents on their knees, as the custom had formerly been.”
The second time, when, with respect to the duke de Valette’s trial, the
president Bellièvre, in decorous but dignified language, remonstrated
with Louis on his gross violation of justice and proper feeling, in
wishing the judges to sit in his own palace, while he was present to
overawe them, he furiously replied, that he detested all those who
opposed his trying a duke and peer wherever he pleased. They were, he
told them, ignorant beings, unfit for their office, and he did not know
whether he should not put others in their place. “I will be obeyed,”
said he; “and I will soon make you see plainly that all privileges are
founded only on a bad custom, and that I will not hear them talked
about any more.” But from this—which, however, can scarcely be called a
digression—let us return to his captives in the Bastile.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account