The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The count de la Châtre, in his Memoirs, relates a circumstance respecting
the liberation of Vitry and his fellow prisoners. The anecdote shows,
among other things, to what an extent Louis XIII. was infected with what
Byron calls the “good old gentlemanly vice” of avarice. “The cardinal
(Mazarin) and M. de Chavigny,” says la Châtre, “solicited the king for
the deliverance of the marshals Vitry and Bassompierre, and the count
de Cramail. The means which they employed on this occasion deserve to
be recorded, as being rather pleasant; for, finding that the king was
not very willing to comply, they attacked him on his weak side, and
represented to him that these three prisoners cost him an enormous sum
to keep them in the Bastile, and that, as they were no longer able to
raise cabals in the kingdom, they might as well be at home, where they
would cost him nothing. This indirect mode succeeded, this prince being
possessed by such extraordinary avarice, that whoever asked him for money
was an insufferable burthen to him; so far did he carry this, that, after
the return of Treville, Beaupuy, and others, whom the violence of the
late cardinal (Richelieu) had, when he was dying, forced him to abandon,
he sought occasion to give a rebuff to each of them, that he might
prevent them from hoping to be rewarded for what they had suffered for
him.” Here we see a king beginning his reign by prompting his servants to
commit murder, and ending it by displaying cold-blooded ingratitude to
those who had been faithful to him—fit end for such a beginning!
From a noble, who stained his hands with blood, to win the favour of a
king, we gladly turn to a plebeian, who risked his life, rather than
violate his fidelity to the neglected and ill-used consort of that
monarch. Peter de la Porte was this plebeian, who, though his trials were
not carried to such a dreadful extent as those of the chevalier de Jars,
has a legitimate claim, as far as regards probity and firmness of mind,
to be placed in the same class with that distinguished character. La
Porte was born in 1603, and entered into the service of Anne of Austria
at the age of eighteen, as one of her cloak-bearers. It being suspected
that he was trusted by the queen, he was deprived of his office in 1626,
when a desperate attempt was made by the minister to implicate her in the
conspiracy of La Chalais. He then entered into her body guards. In 1631,
he was, however, allowed to resume his former situation.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account