The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
Foiled in this attempt to reach the secret, Richelieu tried whether it
might not be wrung from the servants of the queen. La Porte, as being
supposed to possess a large share of her confidence, was of course most
open to suspicion and persecution. There had, besides, been found upon
him a letter from the queen to the duchess of Chevreuse, who was then in
exile. In the month of August, 1637, he was committed to the Bastile.
Here he was repeatedly and severely questioned, but nothing to criminate
his royal mistress could be drawn from him. It was in vain that the
cardinal himself employed threats and promises, to obtain the information
which he so much desired. The obstinate fidelity of La Porte was not to
be shaken, even when the commissary showed him a paper, which he said
contained an order for applying to him the torture, and took him to the
room that he might see the instruments. He was equally proof to the fear
of death.
In May, 1638, it being then certain that, after being childless for
two-and-twenty years, Anne of Austria was in a situation to give an
heir to the throne, the liberation of La Porte was granted to her. He
was, however, exiled to Saumur, where he resided till the decease of
Louis XIII. When Anne became regent, she recalled him, and gave him a
hundred thousand francs, that he might purchase the place of principal
valet-de-chambre to the king. This office he held for several years.
But La Porte was too honest to prosper in a corrupt court. Sincerely
attached to the queen-regent, he thought it his duty to apprise her of
the degrading reports which were spread, on the subject of her long
interviews with Mazarin, and by this candour he cooled her friendship
and gratitude, while, at the same time, he incurred the enmity of the
cardinal himself, by communicating to her a circumstance, relative to
the young king, which Mazarin was desirous of keeping concealed. In
revenge, Mazarin deprived him of his place, and forbad him to appear at
court. It was not till after the death of the cardinal that La Porte was
again admitted to the king’s presence, and from him he met with a kind
reception. He died in 1680.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account