The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captivesDavenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
History
The history of the Bastile, and of its principal captives
Davenport, R. A. (Richard Alfred)
Bastille -- History; Political crimes and offenses -- France; Prisons -- France -- History
The battle of Thionville, which was fought in 1639, and terminated in
the defeat of the French, and the death of Feuquieres, their general,
gave two prisoners to the Bastile; not foreign enemies, or rebellious
Frenchmen, but officers who had combated for their country—the count de
Grancé and the marquis de Praslin. At Thionville, the troops under their
orders refused to advance, and finally ran away. It appears, from the
testimony of Bassompierre, that no blame was attributable to the count
or the marquis; they were nevertheless immured in the Bastile, though
it does not seem easy to discern how the cowardice of soldiers is to
be cured by imprisoning their officers. It was, however, in a similar
kind of spirit, only somewhat more barbarous, that in England, more
than a century afterwards, admiral Byng was sacrificed (murdered is the
proper word); not, as Voltaire sarcastically observes, “to encourage the
others,” but to divert public indignation from its proper objects. The
system was carried to a horrible length in France, during the reign of
terror. Less sanguinary, in this instance, than his imitators, Richelieu
contented himself with inflicting a short deprivation of liberty. The two
captives were restored to favour, and Grancé rose, in the next reign, to
the rank of marshal.
The next two cases which are on record, afford a striking proof of
the contempt in which Richelieu held justice and the law of nations,
whenever they chanced to stand in the way of his political schemes, and
the gratification of his vindictive spirit. On the death of the gallant
warrior, Bernard of Saxe Weimar, which took place in the summer of 1639,
the possession of his admirably trained army became an object which all
the belligerent powers were eager to obtain. Among those who sought the
prize was the Prince Palatine, a son of the unfortunate Frederic, who
lost the crown of Bohemia and his own hereditary states. The prince was
passing through France, from England, to enter on the negociation, when
he was arrested, and sent to the Bastile, under pretence of his being an
unknown and suspected person. Richelieu, meanwhile, pushed on his treaty
with the officers of the deceased duke, and succeeded in purchasing their
services for France. When this was accomplished, it was discovered that
the arrest of the Prince Palatine was a mistake, and he was consequently
set free.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account